starred/karakeep

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/karakeep-app/karakeep.git synced 2026-04-24 23:46:06 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #2172] Uncertain origin of alpine chrome image #1330

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-02 11:56:34 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-02 11:56:34 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @MemQu on GitHub (Nov 25, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/karakeep-app/karakeep/issues/2172

Describe the Bug

This was pointed out earlier:

https://github.com/karakeep-app/karakeep/issues/1241#issuecomment-2818253924

We have confirmation from the owner of the repo:

https://github.com/jlandure/alpine-chrome/issues/272#issuecomment-3536582057

https://github.com/jlandure/alpine-chrome/blob/master/README.md

Noticed it when sec-comp broke with the new image.

Steps to Reproduce

None

Expected Behaviour

Using new open source alpine chrome image

Screenshots or Additional Context

No response

Device Details

No response

Exact Karakeep Version

Have you checked the troubleshooting guide?

I have checked the troubleshooting guide and I haven't found a solution to my problem

Originally created by @MemQu on GitHub (Nov 25, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/karakeep-app/karakeep/issues/2172 ### Describe the Bug This was pointed out earlier: https://github.com/karakeep-app/karakeep/issues/1241#issuecomment-2818253924 We have confirmation from the owner of the repo: https://github.com/jlandure/alpine-chrome/issues/272#issuecomment-3536582057 https://github.com/jlandure/alpine-chrome/blob/master/README.md Noticed it when sec-comp broke with the new image. ### Steps to Reproduce None ### Expected Behaviour Using new open source alpine chrome image ### Screenshots or Additional Context _No response_ ### Device Details _No response_ ### Exact Karakeep Version NA ### Have you checked the troubleshooting guide? - [x] I have checked the troubleshooting guide and I haven't found a solution to my problem

kerem added the

bug

status/approved

pri/medium

labels

2026-03-02 11:56:34 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-02 11:56:35 +03:00

Author

Owner

@xuatz commented on GitHub (Nov 26, 2025):

Thank you for sharing the update from the original maintainer.

How about https://hub.docker.com/r/chromedp/headless-shell? @MemQu @MohamedBassem

I think I'll start by trying it out on my own instance

edit1: mmm i'm having problems getting it to work lol, maybe i will try ghcr.io/browserless/chromium instead

edit2: okay, got ghcr.io/browserless/chromium working

@xuatz commented on GitHub (Nov 26, 2025): Thank you for sharing the update from the original maintainer. How about https://hub.docker.com/r/chromedp/headless-shell? @MemQu @MohamedBassem I think I'll start by trying it out on my own instance edit1: mmm i'm having problems getting it to work lol, maybe i will try ghcr.io/browserless/chromium instead edit2: okay, got ghcr.io/browserless/chromium working

kerem commented

2026-03-02 11:56:35 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Ra72xx commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2025):

The image docker.io/chromedp/headless-shell:latest seems to work without any further parameters.

@Ra72xx commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2025): The image docker.io/chromedp/headless-shell:latest seems to work without any further parameters.

kerem commented

2026-03-02 11:56:35 +03:00

Author

Owner

@MohamedBassem commented on GitHub (Dec 7, 2025):

Thanks for flagging the issue. I know that browserless container works (because it's what people use on unraid) and is geared toward crawling, so it sounds like a good fit. Only problem with it is that last time I tried it, the container was quite big (1GB+), but maybe that's fine?

@MohamedBassem commented on GitHub (Dec 7, 2025): Thanks for flagging the issue. I know that browserless container works (because it's what people use on unraid) and is geared toward crawling, so it sounds like a good fit. Only problem with it is that last time I tried it, the container was quite big (1GB+), but maybe that's fine?

kerem commented

2026-03-02 11:56:35 +03:00

Author

Owner

@MohamedBassem commented on GitHub (Dec 7, 2025):

One problem with browserless is that it has some non conventional license, which adds caveat to people who are using karakeep in commercial environments.

@MohamedBassem commented on GitHub (Dec 7, 2025): One problem with browserless is that it has some non conventional license, which adds caveat to people who are using karakeep in commercial environments.

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/karakeep#1330

No description provided.

Rows
Columns