[GH-ISSUE #92] Where is the output? #37

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-03 13:52:25 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-03 13:52:25 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @Duoquote on GitHub (Sep 11, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jehna/humanify/issues/92

I ran the command like this:

bun x humanifyjs local responsez.js

ggml_vulkan: Found 1 Vulkan devices:
Vulkan0: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (NVIDIA) | uma: 0 | fp16: 0 | warp size: 32
[node-llama-cpp] Using this model ("C:\Users\duoquote\.humanifyjs\models\Phi-3.1-mini-4k-instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf") to tokenize text with special tokens and then detokenize it resulted in a different text. There might be an issue with the model or the tokenizer implementation. Using this model may not work as intended
Processing file 1/1
Processing: 100%

But there is nothing else, no output or whatsoever.

Originally created by @Duoquote on GitHub (Sep 11, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jehna/humanify/issues/92 I ran the command like this: ```bash bun x humanifyjs local responsez.js ggml_vulkan: Found 1 Vulkan devices: Vulkan0: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (NVIDIA) | uma: 0 | fp16: 0 | warp size: 32 [node-llama-cpp] Using this model ("C:\Users\duoquote\.humanifyjs\models\Phi-3.1-mini-4k-instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf") to tokenize text with special tokens and then detokenize it resulted in a different text. There might be an issue with the model or the tokenizer implementation. Using this model may not work as intended Processing file 1/1 Processing: 100% ``` But there is nothing else, no output or whatsoever.

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-03 13:52:25 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-03 13:52:26 +03:00

Author

Owner

@jehna commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2024):

Should be an output folder? Have not tested with bun though

@jehna commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2024): Should be an `output` folder? Have not tested with bun though

kerem commented

2026-03-03 13:52:26 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Duoquote commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2024):

Oh okay I see, there were a lot of files in that folder that's why I didn't notice, also there is no mention that the output is written into output folder. Thanks!

@Duoquote commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2024): Oh okay I see, there were a lot of files in that folder that's why I didn't notice, also there is no mention that the output is written into `output` folder. Thanks!

kerem commented

2026-03-03 13:52:26 +03:00

Author

Owner

@jehna commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2024):

Good point! The tool should probably output the list of files in the end 🤔
I'll keep this issue opened until I fix this

@jehna commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2024): Good point! The tool should probably output the list of files in the end 🤔 I'll keep this issue opened until I fix this

kerem commented

2026-03-03 13:52:26 +03:00

Author

Owner

@neoOpus commented on GitHub (Sep 12, 2024):

Good point! The tool should probably output the list of files in the end 🤔 I'll keep this issue opened until I fix this

Please also don't forget to take my other suggestion regarding the output into account... That would make things more manageable in the long-term and straight forward and if you can delegate me some tasks so I can try to help (even if I don't consider myself a coder yet), I will be glad to do so.

@neoOpus commented on GitHub (Sep 12, 2024): > Good point! The tool should probably output the list of files in the end 🤔 I'll keep this issue opened until I fix this Please also don't forget to take my other suggestion regarding the output into account... That would make things more manageable in the long-term and straight forward and if you can delegate me some tasks so I can try to help (even if I don't consider myself a coder yet), I will be glad to do so.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-03 13:53:09 +03:00

[PR #37] [MERGED] Bump @types/node from 22.2.0 to 22.3.0 #116