mirror of
https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch.git
synced 2026-04-26 01:06:00 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #3035] [bug]: SyntaxError: The requested module '@nuxt/kit' does not provide an export named 'clearRequireCache' #989
Labels
No labels
CodeDay
a11y
browser limited
bug
bug fix
cli
core
critical
design
desktop
discussion
docker
documentation
duplicate
enterprise
feature
feature
fosshack
future
good first issue
hacktoberfest
help wanted
i18n
invalid
major
minor
need information
need testing
not applicable to hoppscotch
not reproducible
pull-request
question
refactor
resolved
sandbox
self-host
spam
stale
testmu
wip
wont fix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hoppscotch#989
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @ghost on GitHub (May 4, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/3035
Is there an existing issue for this?
Current behavior
Current behavior
Local development environment:
v2.2.0Environment details :
OS Detail :
Node Version and npm version :
Steps to reproduce
v2.2.0Environment
Production
Version
Local
@AndrewBastin commented on GitHub (May 4, 2023):
@fti-sfuke This looks like an old version of the codebase, can you pull the latest and see if the issue still persists ?
@ghost commented on GitHub (May 5, 2023):
Hi @AndrewBastin Thanks for the response.
I tried to pull the latest
mainas well as the new release tag2023.4.1But from the
2023.4.1codebase its faild here.hoppscotch-backend@2023.4.1 generate-gql-sdl /root/hoppscotch/packages/hoppscotch-backend
Here is the complete details :
https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/3034#issuecomment-1535881873
https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/3034#issuecomment-1535893072
@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (May 5, 2023):
Since the issue mentioned in this issue description is not reproducible, I'm closing this issue.
@fti-sfuke, kindly track your issue on #3034.