[GH-ISSUE #2958] [feature]: Authorization. Allow manually changing the `bearer` token prefix #963

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-16 17:50:25 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-16 17:50:25 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @Teraskull on GitHub (Apr 1, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/2958

Is there an existing issue for this?

I have searched the existing issues

Summary

This is how it's implemented in Thunder Client:

Why should this be worked on?

That way, we won't need to manually add an Authorization: TOKEN to headers, and have it separated in the Authorization tab.

Originally created by @Teraskull on GitHub (Apr 1, 2023). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/2958 ### Is there an existing issue for this? - [X] I have searched the existing issues ### Summary This is how it's implemented in [Thunder Client](https://www.thunderclient.com/): ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/24798198/229269773-5167587f-99b0-468c-9a09-d2b8c31a4eae.png) ### Why should this be worked on? That way, we won't need to manually add an `Authorization: TOKEN` to headers, and have it separated in the Authorization tab.

kerem added the

feature

label

2026-03-16 17:50:25 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-16 17:50:36 +03:00

Author

Owner

@SneakySensei commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2023):

Although the absence of this input promotes good naming conventions during API development, there are times when those conventions are not followed. This is a much-needed feature. Can I take this up?

@SneakySensei commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2023): Although the absence of this input promotes good naming conventions during API development, there are times when those conventions are not followed. This is a much-needed feature. Can I take this up?

kerem commented

2026-03-16 17:50:41 +03:00

Author

Owner

@olalekanteeblaze commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2023):

I'll like to work on this

@olalekanteeblaze commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2023): I'll like to work on this

kerem commented

2026-03-16 17:50:46 +03:00

Author

Owner

@kunalvirk commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2023):

Hi @olalekanteeblaze, @SneakySensei ,
Would you like to work on this together? As I am not proefficient with vue.js, I still gave it a try at https://github.com/kunalvirk/hoppscotch/tree/fix/custom-bearer-token-prefix.

Thanks,

@kunalvirk commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2023): Hi @olalekanteeblaze, @SneakySensei , Would you like to work on this together? As I am not proefficient with vue.js, I still gave it a try at https://github.com/kunalvirk/hoppscotch/tree/fix/custom-bearer-token-prefix. Thanks,

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-17 00:37:52 +03:00

[PR #963] [MERGED] ⬆️ Bump @nuxtjs/sitemap from 2.3.2 to 2.4.0 #2972