mirror of
https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch.git
synced 2026-04-26 01:06:00 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #2555] [feature]: Built a VS code extension for hoppscotch. #852
Labels
No labels
CodeDay
a11y
browser limited
bug
bug fix
cli
core
critical
design
desktop
discussion
docker
documentation
duplicate
enterprise
feature
feature
fosshack
future
good first issue
hacktoberfest
help wanted
i18n
invalid
major
minor
need information
need testing
not applicable to hoppscotch
not reproducible
pull-request
question
refactor
resolved
sandbox
self-host
spam
stale
testmu
wip
wont fix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hoppscotch#852
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @ravi-sankarp on GitHub (Aug 3, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/2555
Is there an existing issue for this?
Summary
I personally think VS code is the most used IDE for web development by both newcomers and other senior developers.So it would be nice to have a VS code extension for testing web API . Currently there is an extension called Thunder Client.But the UI is not so good.So It would be good if Hoppscotch was available for vs code.Also I think everybody would't like to open up a browser and use an API tester.So it would be good for both Hoppscotch and we developers.
Also I think in VS code you guys could implement cookie support.It would be well added feature.
Why should this be worked on?
I think this would be good for both hoppscotch and we developers
@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2022):
https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/313#issuecomment-607557925
@ravi-sankarp commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2022):
I see that you are not planning on implementing such a feature.It would have been more easier for developers if they are able to sent requests and see the console output in the same application.The reason I opened this is because I felt so.Anyways good luck ahead.Wishing you guys all the best