mirror of
https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch.git
synced 2026-04-26 01:06:00 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #2405] [feature]: parameters in url #814
Labels
No labels
CodeDay
a11y
browser limited
bug
bug fix
cli
core
critical
design
desktop
discussion
docker
documentation
duplicate
enterprise
feature
feature
fosshack
future
good first issue
hacktoberfest
help wanted
i18n
invalid
major
minor
need information
need testing
not applicable to hoppscotch
not reproducible
pull-request
question
refactor
resolved
sandbox
self-host
spam
stale
testmu
wip
wont fix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hoppscotch#814
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @phate89 on GitHub (Jun 8, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/2405
Is there an existing issue for this?
Summary
https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/pull/840
I found this feature merged but it doesn't exist in current version. It was reverted?
Thanks
Why should this be worked on?
Today rest api use a lot of stuff passed not as parameters but as part of the url.
@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Jun 8, 2022):
Possible duplicate of
#2227#2086, hence closing.@phate89 commented on GitHub (Jun 8, 2022):
@liyasthomas that's not what the request was about.
The pr implemwnts a way to use parameters in url but like this:
Https://myapi.com/myresource/ < < resourceid > >
(Where resourceid is a parameter defined)
Instead of the usual Https://myapi.com/myresource?resourceid=something that is rarely used nowadays with rest API.
The pr was reverted or something? Because it was merged
@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Jun 8, 2022):
Hi @phate89, sorry for the delay. It was a typo from my end. I've mentioned the correct issue ticket number in my original comment.
Support for inline path variables has been dropped on a refactor. As of now, we're tracking its priority in #2086. Please share your thoughts on the same issue ticket.