mirror of
https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch.git
synced 2026-04-26 09:16:03 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #1583] [feature] send multiple requests to single url in batch while testing #499
Labels
No labels
CodeDay
a11y
browser limited
bug
bug fix
cli
core
critical
design
desktop
discussion
docker
documentation
duplicate
enterprise
feature
feature
fosshack
future
good first issue
hacktoberfest
help wanted
i18n
invalid
major
minor
need information
need testing
not applicable to hoppscotch
not reproducible
pull-request
question
refactor
resolved
sandbox
self-host
spam
stale
testmu
wip
wont fix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hoppscotch#499
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @jatin33 on GitHub (Apr 8, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/1583
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'm always frustrated when I have to send request to same url endpoint multiple times
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be great if we can build something where you can provide how many times a request should be triggered and then it automatically sends request at that mentioned url endpoint and show the api response of all requests being made.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Currently we have to manually send requests bu clicking Send button multiple times
Additional context
NA
@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2021):
Thanks for the feature suggestion. You're referring to "chain multiple requests" and "show responses in batch" right? We'll consider this feature request ASAP.
@jatin33 commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2021):
Can i work on this if possible? @liyasthomas
@jatin33 commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2021):
Yes exactly
@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2021):
@jatin33 yes you can give it a try. Let me know if you need any help from our end. Assigning this issue to you.
@jatin33 commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2021):
That sounds great, thanks @liyasthomas
@snapeur82 commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2021):
Marci lov Bot Spike frech for me plaise
@snapeur82 commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2021):
Love wour programme
Le jeu. 8 avr. 2021 13 h 09, Jatin Panjwani @.***> a
écrit :
@jatin33 commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2021):
@liyasthomas needed to discuss its design,
For starters, I think we can add a kebab menu on top of send button where we can provide options to configure request being sent
something like this
and when one of the options selected from kebab menu Chain Multiple Requests we should see input box below
Let me know if you hame some different idea of implementing this
@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2021):
@jatin33 this looks simple and very straightforward. I liked it. You can proceed with this design.
@jatin33 commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2021):
great thanks, will try implementing this
@snapeur82 commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2021):
Yessss
Le sam. 10 avr. 2021 13 h 41, Jatin Panjwani @.***> a
écrit :
@EdwinFajardoBarrera commented on GitHub (Jan 3, 2022):
Is this available? Is it has any progress? I would like to contribute.
@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Jan 4, 2022):
Hi @EdwinFajardoBarrera, seems like this feature request is not assigned to anyone - let me know how you'd approach this feature.
@EdwinFajardoBarrera commented on GitHub (Jan 5, 2022):
Hi @liyasthomas, sorry for the waiting time, I have some ideas:
I would like to add the kebab menu on the right side of saving options (with a 'tooltip' with configuration meaning). I have the idea of adding inside this menu a number input (with default 1 as count) and adding each response in the result, maybe separated by a visual element.
Another idea is to add another tab, especially for loop requesting.
I would like to read your opinion and get some guidance about modules that could be implied in this implementation.
@calumk commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2023):
This would still be a good addition
@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2023):
We're working on a "Collection Runner" feature that should achieve something very similar to this. Track here: #3600.
@gethari commented on GitHub (Mar 4, 2025):
Running on loop for a single request is not available yet correct ?