[GH-ISSUE #1353] Add more test methods #444

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-16 15:20:28 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-16 15:20:28 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @carlos-ds on GitHub (Nov 30, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/1353

I'd like to add some more built-in assertion methods to the tests section because that is currently limited to:

toHaveProperty
toBe
toBeLevel2xx
toBeLevel3xx
toBeLevel4xx
toBeLevel5xx

I'm thinking about adding at least:

toHaveLengthOf
toBeOfType

I'd also write some tests for both these methods and the currently existing methods.

Let me know if you have more ideas or remarks about this topic.

Originally created by @carlos-ds on GitHub (Nov 30, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/1353 I'd like to add some more built-in assertion methods to the tests section because that is currently limited to: - toHaveProperty - toBe - toBeLevel2xx - toBeLevel3xx - toBeLevel4xx - toBeLevel5xx I'm thinking about adding at least: - toHaveLengthOf - toBeOfType I'd also write some tests for both these methods and the currently existing methods. Let me know if you have more ideas or remarks about this topic.

kerem

2026-03-16 15:20:28 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
feature
label

kerem commented

2026-03-16 15:20:45 +03:00

Author

Owner

@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2020):

Thanks for bringing this up. These are some essential additions. The testing part of Hoppscotch can be increased a lot more and have unmet potentials.

@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2020): Thanks for bringing this up. These are some essential additions. The testing part of Hoppscotch can be increased a lot more and have unmet potentials.

kerem commented

2026-03-16 15:20:50 +03:00

Author

Owner

@carlos-ds commented on GitHub (Dec 1, 2020):

PR: #1357

@carlos-ds commented on GitHub (Dec 1, 2020): PR: #1357

kerem commented

2026-03-16 15:20:55 +03:00

Author

Owner

@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2020):

Resolved in #1357.

@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2020): Resolved in #1357.

kerem commented

2026-03-16 15:21:00 +03:00

Author

Owner

@humbertoarizah commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2022):

Hi, I have been having problems with the method "toHaveProperty", for any reason I'm getting an error ('unknown property 'toHaveProperty'). Even when I try to replicate the following example, I get the error:

// This test will pass
pw.test("Response is ok", () => {
pw.expect(pw.response.status).toBe(200);
pw.expect(pw.response.body).not.toHaveProperty("errors");
});

So, I'm not sure what is happening?
I would appreciated any help.

@humbertoarizah commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2022): Hi, I have been having problems with the method "toHaveProperty", for any reason I'm getting an error ('unknown property 'toHaveProperty'). Even when I try to replicate the following example, I get the error: // This test will pass pw.test("Response is ok", () => { pw.expect(pw.response.status).toBe(200); pw.expect(pw.response.body).not.toHaveProperty("errors"); }); So, I'm not sure what is happening? I would appreciated any help.