[PR #1880] [MERGED] Improve Dutch translations #3538

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-17 01:08:40 +03:00 by kerem · 0 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-17 01:08:40 +03:00

Owner

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/pull/1880
Author: @geertw
Created: 10/17/2021
Status: ✅ Merged
Merged: 10/17/2021
Merged by: @liyasthomas

Base: main ← Head: main

📝 Commits (1)

4b76021 Improve Dutch translations

📊 Changes

1 file changed (+54 additions, -54 deletions)

View changed files

📝 packages/hoppscotch-app/locales/nl.json (+54 -54)

📄 Description

Hi! I saw Hoppscotch mentioned on Changelog.com, tried it and liked it. However I saw that many Dutch translations were either wrongly translated (e.g. they were correct in a direct dictionary translation, but sometimes the wrong translation was chosen), and I also saw that there were some discrepancies between the formal (u/uw) and informal (je/jouw) speech. I've changed all those instances to informal which suits best for this application.

Hope this one is useful!

_{🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.}

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/pull/1880 **Author:** [@geertw](https://github.com/geertw) **Created:** 10/17/2021 **Status:** ✅ Merged **Merged:** 10/17/2021 **Merged by:** [@liyasthomas](https://github.com/liyasthomas) **Base:** `main` ← **Head:** `main` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`4b76021`](https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/commit/4b7602198414a26fb249f6c9fc5916f1c84fc6d9) Improve Dutch translations ### 📊 Changes **1 file changed** (+54 additions, -54 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `packages/hoppscotch-app/locales/nl.json` (+54 -54) </details> ### 📄 Description Hi! I saw Hoppscotch mentioned on Changelog.com, tried it and liked it. However I saw that many Dutch translations were either wrongly translated (e.g. they were correct in a direct dictionary translation, but sometimes the wrong translation was chosen), and I also saw that there were some discrepancies between the formal (u/uw) and informal (je/jouw) speech. I've changed all those instances to informal which suits best for this application. Hope this one is useful! --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>