[GH-ISSUE #557] Disable SSL cert for websockets #207

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-16 14:02:23 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-16 14:02:23 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @and7ey on GitHub (Feb 6, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/557

There should be an option to disable SSL certificates validation for websockets.
Sample python example:
ws = websocket.WebSocket(sslopt={'cert_reqs': ssl.CERT_NONE}, origin='http://example.com/')

Originally created by @and7ey on GitHub (Feb 6, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/557 There should be an option to disable SSL certificates validation for websockets. Sample python example: `ws = websocket.WebSocket(sslopt={'cert_reqs': ssl.CERT_NONE}, origin='http://example.com/')`

kerem

2026-03-16 14:02:23 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
feature
label

kerem commented

2026-03-16 14:02:39 +03:00

Author

Owner

@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Feb 7, 2020):

Are you using a self-signed cert for the purpose?

@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Feb 7, 2020): Are you using a self-signed cert for the purpose?

kerem commented

2026-03-16 14:02:44 +03:00

Author

Owner

@and7ey commented on GitHub (Feb 7, 2020):

No.
Use websocket_client python library, https://github.com/websocket-client/websocket-client. FAQ there says that it disables ssl cert verification.
If I try to connect to the same webserver with postwoman, then connection is immediately closed. If I do it with python script and ssl cert verification disabled - it works fine.

@and7ey commented on GitHub (Feb 7, 2020): No. Use websocket_client python library, https://github.com/websocket-client/websocket-client. FAQ there says that it disables ssl cert verification. If I try to connect to the same webserver with postwoman, then connection is immediately closed. If I do it with python script and ssl cert verification disabled - it works fine.

kerem commented

2026-03-16 14:02:49 +03:00

Author

Owner

@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2020):

This seems to be a subset of #392 . And both implementation have same scope. Closing this issue temporarily for tracking the previously requested feature.

@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2020): This seems to be a subset of #392 . And both implementation have same scope. Closing this issue temporarily for tracking the previously requested feature.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-17 00:11:02 +03:00

[PR #207] [MERGED] Feature/log errors #2482