mirror of
https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch.git
synced 2026-04-26 01:06:00 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #468] Friendly minded GraphQL #178
Labels
No labels
CodeDay
a11y
browser limited
bug
bug fix
cli
core
critical
design
desktop
discussion
docker
documentation
duplicate
enterprise
feature
feature
fosshack
future
good first issue
hacktoberfest
help wanted
i18n
invalid
major
minor
need information
need testing
not applicable to hoppscotch
not reproducible
pull-request
question
refactor
resolved
sandbox
self-host
spam
stale
testmu
wip
wont fix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hoppscotch#178
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @ac2epsilon on GitHub (Jan 2, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/468
Originally assigned to: @AndrewBastin on GitHub.
GraphQL can be friendly minded
It's hard for decent coder and impossible for novice to input right GraphQL query or mutator from the first take. And even from third. So: clicking on query have to fill request textarea with fully working template and click on type have to produce all-in-line repr like
query {
characters(page:${_page}) {
info {count...}
results {id name status species....}
}
} // note as we do ${_page} - yeah we make variables automatically and show them in the list below query window
All what user have to do is to remove fields she don't wish to see in result. And we will see how to instantiate response for further scripting...
AND also there are UX ideas of course related to naive list of GQL types and queries. It must be tree or something folding or such. As I asked in other issue and do it again I wish to use one of the toolkits namely Material or Vuetify or whatever and then we came back to UX.
Nobody does this. We are not competing. We dominate
@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Jan 3, 2020):
GraphQL testing is very alpha and do need major polishing. Auto-suggestions on query section and Tree model etc are few of them. Let's track GQL UX improvements on this thread 👍
@AndrewBastin
@AndrewBastin commented on GitHub (Jan 6, 2020):
@ac2epsilon thanks for opening this issue. Sorry, for the late response, I was away from Postwoman for the holidays.
Anyways, yeah you are right, the GraphQL UX needs a ton of polish and I will work on getting that properly done in the coming days.
@liyasthomas commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2020):
Since GraphQL section has improved tremendously over the past few week, I think this issue is stale now.