[GH-ISSUE #4620] [feature]: Hoppscotch Test Enhancements: Numeric & Response time Assertions #1714

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-16 21:30:54 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment

kerem commented

2026-03-16 21:30:54 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @praveenk-78 on GitHub (Dec 16, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/4620

Is there an existing issue for this?

I have searched the existing issues

Summary

This enhancement request is to introducs new assertion functions for numeric value i.e. toBeGreaterThan, toBeLessThan, toBeGreaterThanOrEqual &toBeLessThanOrEqual to Hoppscotch's API testing framework, along with the ability to assert against response duration.

Why should this be worked on?

Current Hoppscotch testing lacks the granularity to easily perform numerical comparisons and response time validations. These additions are crucial for robust API testing, allowing developers to verify not just the correctness of data but also the performance of their APIs.

Originally created by @praveenk-78 on GitHub (Dec 16, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/4620 ### Is there an existing issue for this? - [X] I have searched the existing issues ### Summary This enhancement request is to introducs new assertion functions for numeric value i.e. toBeGreaterThan, toBeLessThan, toBeGreaterThanOrEqual &toBeLessThanOrEqual to Hoppscotch's API testing framework, along with the ability to assert against response duration. ### Why should this be worked on? Current Hoppscotch testing lacks the granularity to easily perform numerical comparisons and response time validations. These additions are crucial for robust API testing, allowing developers to verify not just the correctness of data but also the performance of their APIs.

kerem

2026-03-16 21:30:54 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
feature
label

kerem commented

2026-03-16 21:31:10 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ddierickx commented on GitHub (Jun 24, 2025):

Thanks a lot @praveenk-78 , this seems like a nice addition, any idea when this would be merged and released? 🙌

@ddierickx commented on GitHub (Jun 24, 2025): Thanks a lot @praveenk-78 , this seems like a nice addition, any idea when this would be merged and released? 🙌