mirror of
https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch.git
synced 2026-04-25 16:55:59 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #3211] [feature]: customize oAuth methods on SelfHosted #1061
Labels
No labels
CodeDay
a11y
browser limited
bug
bug fix
cli
core
critical
design
desktop
discussion
docker
documentation
duplicate
enterprise
feature
feature
fosshack
future
good first issue
hacktoberfest
help wanted
i18n
invalid
major
minor
need information
need testing
not applicable to hoppscotch
not reproducible
pull-request
question
refactor
resolved
sandbox
self-host
spam
stale
testmu
wip
wont fix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hoppscotch#1061
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @jmtt89 on GitHub (Jul 25, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch/issues/3211
Is there an existing issue for this?
Summary
All Oath configurations are required, it would be nice if the configuration for a certain platform did not exist in the .env file, that platform would not appear
Why should this be worked on?
When using a self-hosted instance, a very common scenario is to only allow access to members of my company or custom external invites, not anyone with a Google or Microsoft account.
@RaHehl commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2023):
take a look at #3200 & #3088
@jmtt89 commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2023):
but these tasks are only for the frontend, right?
what I know is on backend, if you don't add GOOGLE_SCOPE env variable on .env, the backend app crash with error on split method.
@balub commented on GitHub (Jul 28, 2023):
You can checkout #3204 we are currently working on this.
@AndrewBastin commented on GitHub (Sep 6, 2023):
Closing as this is resolved in 2023.8.0
@jmtt89 commented on GitHub (Sep 7, 2023):
thanks!!