mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 11:15:54 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #2148] Forwarder seems to not use /etc/hosts despite use_hosts_file == true #899
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#899
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @hch12907 on GitHub (Feb 18, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/2148
Describe the bug
I added
201.11.11.11 example.comto/etc/hosts. Pingingexample.comshows that I am pinging the IP, so the hosts configuration is correct and working. But when I useddig example.comon my DNS forwarder it returned93.184.216.34(the actual IP ofexample.comfrom upstream DNS) instead of the IP inside the hosts file.To Reproduce
Here is a small snippet:
Expected behavior
As expected, the snippet above prints
Some(...)with the correct RDataSome(A(A(201.11.11.11))).But unexpectedly,
dig @127.0.0.1 -p 8000 example.comstill returned93.184.216.34. It should be201.11.11.11.System:
Version:
Crate:
hickory-resolver/hickory-serverVersion: 0.24.0
@hch12907 commented on GitHub (Feb 18, 2024):
This is because
AsyncResolver::inner_lookupdoesn't takehostsinto account. OnlyAsyncResolver::lookup_ipdoes.@djc commented on GitHub (Feb 29, 2024):
How/why do you end up calling
inner_lookup(), if not vialookup_ip()?@hch12907 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2024):
(Going by memory since I am not with my laptop currently)
ForwardAuthoritycallsAsyncResolver::lookup(), which in turn callsinner_lookup().