mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 19:25:56 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #2090] hickory-dns binary doesn't forward webpki-roots,native-certs features to hickory-resolver #882
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#882
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @paolobarbolini on GitHub (Nov 11, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/2090
Describe the bug
The hickory-dns forwarding resolver doesn't work when configured to use the
tls,https,quicorh3protocols event after enabling thenative-certsorwebpki-rootsfeatures because those only apply for the server and not for the client.To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
cargo install hickory-dns --no-default-features --features dns-over-rustls,resolver,ascii-artExpected behavior
I expected it to work. Instead after enabling tracing via
RUST_LOG=traceI discovered rustls was returningUnknownIssuererror.System:
Version:
Crate: history-dns
Version: 0.24.0
Additional context
This patch fixed it for me
Probably related to #2067
@djc commented on GitHub (Nov 12, 2023):
Yup, want to send a PR?
@hch12907 commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2024):
Chiming in to say that I have hit the same issue. My patch is slightly more involved, however:
KeyValuetype #1770