mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 03:05:51 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #1976] Graceful shutdown of ServerFuture #836
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#836
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @nmittler on GitHub (Jun 22, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/1976
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When running a DNS server (via
ServerFuture) as part of a larger application, it's desirable to include the shutdown of the DNS server as part of the shutdown workflow for the process.Describe the solution you'd like
Ideally, the DNS server would support hooks to initiate a graceful shutdown, as well as notifying the application when the server shutdown has completed. During a graceful shutdown, the server would finish serving existing requests, but reject new requests.
Describe alternatives you've considered
NA
Additional context
This came up in an Istio PR, which adds a Trust-DNS-based proxy: https://github.com/istio/ztunnel/pull/536#discussion_r1238781334
@djc commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2023):
Sounds good to me to add something like this. Maybe look at how hyper models
Server::with_graceful_shutdown()?@nmittler commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2023):
Sounds good, I'll take a look. I've already started some hacking using the linkerd drain crate, since that's what Istio is using currently. I'll compare and see what works best for
ServerFuture.@blaine commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2023):
This is extremely apropos for us! Will be watching this, let us know if we can help. cc @zeeshanlakhani
@nmittler commented on GitHub (Jul 1, 2023):
@blaine @zeeshanlakhani FYI #1977 is out for review if you're interested