mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 11:15:54 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #1814] Getting the response wireformat #778
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#778
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @mattias-p on GitHub (Oct 31, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/1814
I have this use case where I need to send out DNS queries and save the wireformat of each response. AFAICT trust-dns doesn't really support this use case today. The wireformat gets parsed into an internal representation before I can get my hands on it. From the internal representation I can serialize a new wireformat string, but this is inefficient and there doesn't seem to be any guarantees that this produces an identical wireformat string.
Ideally I'd like trust-dns to postpone parsing the wireformat for as long as possible and provide a public API just below this point.
Other possibilities:
A while ago I tried to refactor the code base to postpone the parsing but it wasn't easy. I'd like to make another stab at it but I'd like to hear your opinion on it and if you have any ideas of how it should be done.
@djc commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2022):
Can you show some example code? It seems sensible to support this use case depending on the amount of complexity it adds.
@mattias-p commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2022):
I couldn't find my previous failed attempt so I tried again and this time I managed to power through all the type errors. I ended up using a different approach than what I suggested in the description above. Instead of letting the responses propagate as SerialMessages up to some point near the top level API I used generics to let the caller decide if responses are to be returned as Messages or SerialMessages.
See #1823.