mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 11:15:54 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #1447] Panic when domain search causes names to exceed 255 bytes #677
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#677
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @olix0r on GitHub (Apr 10, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/1447
We've instrumented fuzz testing in the
linkerd2-proxyrepo, which has surfaced a panic intrust-dns. We've encountered panics via at leastHashandDisplayinvocations ontrust_dns_proto::rr::domain::Name.This appears to be caused by appending search-path domains to names that are near the max expected length of 255 bytes.
To Reproduce
The following code panics:
See
github.com/olix0r/trust-dns@b80930eac1which adds a test that fails.Expected behavior
I'm not sure whether it's appropriate to make
append_domain(etc) fallible, or whether length handling should be more flexible; but, ultimately, trust-dns should handle this case gracefully.System:
Version:
Crate: proto
Version: 0.20.1
cc @DavidKorczynski @hawkw
@bluejekyll commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2021):
Thank you for the reproducible case!