[GH-ISSUE #888] Rework handle_request et al to use futures:🔒:Mutex instead #555

Closed
opened 2026-03-15 23:08:09 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @bluejekyll on GitHub (Oct 17, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/888

Currently a std::sync::Mutex is used, this isn't great for async processing, as it can block an async task unnecessarily.

Originally created by @bluejekyll on GitHub (Oct 17, 2019). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/888 Currently a std::sync::Mutex is used, this isn't great for async processing, as it can block an async task unnecessarily.
kerem 2026-03-15 23:08:09 +03:00
Author
Owner

@bluejekyll commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2019):

Fixed in #935

<!-- gh-comment-id:564812575 --> @bluejekyll commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2019): Fixed in #935
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/hickory-dns#555
No description provided.