mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 11:15:54 +03:00
[PR #2920] [MERGED] Use wait_until() in a second conformance test #3429
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#3429
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
📋 Pull Request Information
Original PR: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/pull/2920
Author: @divergentdave
Created: 4/10/2025
Status: ✅ Merged
Merged: 4/10/2025
Merged by: @divergentdave
Base:
main← Head:david/conformance-use-wait-until📝 Commits (5)
8228d60Use wait_until() in a second conformance test82ca373Reduce rightward drift when destructuring capturebfa4672Reduce rightward drift when checking destinationa7e4949Hoist stringified domain variable8177b1eReduce rightward drift in loop over queries📊 Changes
1 file changed (+35 additions, -28 deletions)
View changed files
📝
conformance/packages/conformance-tests/src/resolver/dnssec/rfc4035/section_3/section_3_1/section_3_1_4.rs(+35 -28)📄 Description
I noticed this test flaking in CI a couple times recently. Perhaps #2868 made the race condition tighter? This PR rewrites the tshark-related assertion to use the new
wait_until()method, so we won't proceed until we see the expected packet, and not just any packet.🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.