mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 03:05:51 +03:00
[PR #1466] [CLOSED] allow receiving multiple response to a single zone transfert request #2343
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#2343
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
📋 Pull Request Information
Original PR: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/pull/1466
Author: @trinity-1686a
Created: 4/20/2021
Status: ❌ Closed
Base:
main← Head:xfr-multiple-response📝 Commits (2)
c882f9eallow receiving multiple response to a single zone transfert request2a7cc37add test for receiving multi-message xfr response📊 Changes
4 files changed (+429 additions, -20 deletions)
View changed files
📝
crates/proto/Cargo.toml(+1 -1)📝
crates/proto/src/xfer/dns_multiplexer.rs(+330 -10)📝
crates/proto/src/xfer/dns_response.rs(+97 -8)📝
tests/integration-tests/src/lib.rs(+1 -1)📄 Description
fix #1277
This does not allow to transmit a zone of unlimited size, but only up to 1000 messages (arbitrary number), which seems enough for most use-cases. There is no easy way to apply back-pressure on the stream sending the zone, so even if the code used
Streams more, there would still be the need for a limit.This would probably need some test
🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.