[GH-ISSUE #515] mDNS Responder? #216

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-07 22:50:27 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-07 22:50:27 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @dan-f on GitHub (Jun 17, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/515

I'm wondering if the current implementation of mDNS in this library supports responding to mDNS queries in addition to issuing the queries themselves.

My use case is a p2p application over a local network in which nodes need the ability to advertise themselves as peers.

Thanks!

Originally created by @dan-f on GitHub (Jun 17, 2018). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/515 I'm wondering if the current implementation of mDNS in this library supports _responding_ to mDNS queries in addition to issuing the queries themselves. My use case is a p2p application over a local network in which nodes need the ability to advertise themselves as peers. Thanks!

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-07 22:50:32 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-07 22:50:38 +03:00

Author

Owner

@bluejekyll commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2018):

Not yet. I haven't gotten back to support an mDNS responder yet. This is a big goal of mine though...

On top of that some additional debugging needs to happen, as we've noticed that DNS-SD over mDNS isn't capturing entire sets of services on the network, so there are some bugs...

@bluejekyll commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2018): Not yet. I haven't gotten back to support an mDNS responder yet. This is a big goal of mine though... On top of that some additional debugging needs to happen, as we've noticed that DNS-SD over mDNS isn't capturing entire sets of services on the network, so there are some bugs...

kerem commented

2026-03-07 22:50:43 +03:00

Author

Owner

@dan-f commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2018):

I see, thanks for the update!

@dan-f commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2018): I see, thanks for the update!

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-15 22:18:29 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #216] Consider the CN (DNS Name, SPKI) of the TLS request #397

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-16 02:04:51 +03:00