mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 19:25:56 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #3110] Dns resolve fail in 0.25.1 version #1134
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#1134
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @vicanso on GitHub (Jul 12, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/3110
Describe the bug
After I upgraded hickory-resolver from 0.24.3 to 0.25.1, the DNS resolution would fail probabilistically.
/etc/resolv.conf:
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
System:
Version:
Crate:hickory-resolver
Version:0.25.1
Additional context
My dns resolution function:
@djc commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2025):
Can you show
dbg!()prints of both theoptionsandconfigon both 0.24.x and 0.25.x?@vicanso commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2025):
0.24.3
0.25.1
@marcus0x62 commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2025):
Without more data, my initial thought is that this is probably due to #2560. @vicanso, can you post a self-contained minimal reproducer or, failing that, show what self.hosts is and how it is constructed/populated with host names? Your query object:
shows a request for a fully-qualified name.
@vicanso commented on GitHub (Jul 13, 2025):
I found that if only keep the Tailscale DNS server, it will be ok.