mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 11:15:54 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #3069] Replace iterator types in MessageResponse #1125
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#1125
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @divergentdave on GitHub (Jun 18, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/3069
MessageResponsecurrently contains four iterators for records in various sections. This means that aMessageResponseis single-use, and thus leads to some awkward repetition of work when dealing with message signatures. We could probably replace these generic iterator types withCow<'a, [Record]>. For reference, here are the five monomorphizations of this type currently used in the codebase.The
Repeatiterator is used in truncation tests, and would be straightforward to replace with an arbitrarily large vector. We can useOption::as_slice()for thestd::option::IntoItercases.@djc commented on GitHub (Jun 19, 2025):
I like this idea a lot but not entirely sure it's workable? The problem (so far) ends up being the
LookupRecords::ManyRecordsvariant, which collects aVec<Arc<RecordSet>>and thus makes it harder to collect a contiguous slice of records. Not sure yet if all theLookupRecords::many()callers have meaningful reasons to recordVec<Arc<RecordSet>>instead of just aVec<Record>...