mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 11:15:54 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #2783] implicitclass and nonewline zones #1060
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#1060
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @Cronvs on GitHub (Feb 15, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/2783
I was trawling through the test configurations and found implicitclass.zone: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/blob/main/tests/test-data/test_configs/default/implicitclass.zone
and nonewline.zone: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/blob/main/tests/test-data/test_configs/default/nonewline.zone
I can't seem to find any reference beyond testing both externally and internally to the project. Does it serve any function beyond testing? The naming suggest it could be a security zone to me.
@djc commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2025):
Indeed, these are only used for some tests. Not sure what you mean by "security zone" in this context.
@Cronvs commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2025):
Ah, no it was a bad way of putting it. Was concerned it might be a default record to avoid a common mistake, one I would be unaware of, even if I'm not sure how one would exploit dns record unless for a mitm. Thank you for clarifying. Closing as complete.