mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 11:15:54 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #2574] Recursor: Name server pool cache does not check TTL #1019
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#1019
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @divergentdave on GitHub (Nov 14, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/2574
Name server pools are stored in a
LruCachein the recursor. Other than eviction by the LRU policy, there's no mechanism to remove a connection pool if the relevant NS/A/AAAA records change. While such changes are rare, this could create troubleshooting headaches.This is mentioned by the following TODOs:
github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns@009c665caa/crates/recursor/src/recursor_dns_handle.rs (L403)github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns@009c665caa/crates/recursor/src/recursor_dns_handle.rs (L461)github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns@009c665caa/crates/recursor/src/recursor_dns_handle.rs (L580)The simple solution would be to store the minimum TTL from the referral records, and rebuild a new pool once that time has elapsed. If the TTL is short, this may introduce unnecessary connection churn. This could be addressed by resolving nameservers again upon TTL expiry, and only discarding the existing pool if the list of IPs has changed, but that would require more invasive changes to the pool-building logic.
@marcus0x62 commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2025):
Addressed in #3337