mirror of
https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns.git
synced 2026-04-25 03:05:51 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #2572] RFC 8906: Correctly responding to queries in the presence of internal errors #1016
Labels
No labels
blocked
breaking-change
bug
bug:critical
bug:tests
cleanup
compliance
compliance
compliance
crate:all
crate:client
crate:native-tls
crate:proto
crate:recursor
crate:resolver
crate:resolver
crate:rustls
crate:server
crate:util
dependencies
docs
duplicate
easy
easy
enhance
enhance
enhance
feature:dns-over-https
feature:dns-over-quic
feature:dns-over-tls
feature:dnsssec
feature:global_lb
feature:mdns
feature:tsig
features:edns
has workaround
ops
perf
platform:WASM
platform:android
platform:fuchsia
platform:linux
platform:macos
platform:windows
pull-request
question
test
tools
tools
trust
unclear
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/hickory-dns#1016
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @divergentdave on GitHub (Nov 12, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/issues/2572
RFC 8906/BCP 231 discusses the failure of DNS servers to respond to queries, or respond with the correct status code, flags, etc. Not responding to a query requires the client to wait until it times out. Incorrect handling of unrecognized query types, record types, or EDNS options requires clients to implement fallback logic, and impedes protocol evolution.
Section 8 of the document provides an extensive list of tests to perform. I spot checked Hickory DNS against 8.1.4, "Testing Unknown Opcodes", and the request timed out. I have noticed previously that errors decoding messages result in dropping them, which may result in failing other tests. These could be added to the conformance test suite.
@bluejekyll commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2025):
I think this is resolved, correct?