starred/hackernews-TUI

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/aome510/hackernews-TUI.git synced 2026-04-26 09:25:56 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #100] "Failed to get stories" on FreeBSD #30

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-14 12:26:56 +03:00 by kerem · 11 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-14 12:26:56 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @phips on GitHub (Dec 21, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/aome510/hackernews-TUI/issues/100

Hello,

Would you have any idea why the client fails to get stories on an ec2 FreeBSD machine, yet a curl works just fine please?

Installed via cargo install hackernews_tui --locked

Thanks!

Originally created by @phips on GitHub (Dec 21, 2023). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/aome510/hackernews-TUI/issues/100 Hello, Would you have any idea why the client fails to get stories on an ec2 FreeBSD machine, yet a `curl` works just fine please? Installed via `cargo install hackernews_tui --locked` Thanks! <img width="857" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-21 at 14 11 03" src="https://github.com/aome510/hackernews-TUI/assets/329022/7d5f94a6-0722-407e-960d-4b7285494c84"> <img width="857" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-21 at 14 11 29" src="https://github.com/aome510/hackernews-TUI/assets/329022/9eec3143-fd7c-48cb-9ad7-b147fdcc64f2">

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-14 12:27:01 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-14 12:27:07 +03:00

Author

Owner

@aome510 commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2023):

Is this a consistent error which happens every time you start the application? Can you also share the application log in .cache folder?

@aome510 commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2023): Is this a consistent error which happens every time you start the application? Can you also share the application log in `.cache` folder?

kerem commented

2026-03-14 12:27:12 +03:00

Author

Owner

@phips commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2023):

Hello @aome510 — yes, everytime. Log should be attached, thanks!

hn-tui.log

@phips commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2023): Hello @aome510 — yes, everytime. Log should be attached, thanks! [hn-tui.log](https://github.com/aome510/hackernews-TUI/files/13751574/hn-tui.log)

kerem commented

2026-03-14 12:27:17 +03:00

Author

Owner

@aome510 commented on GitHub (Dec 24, 2023):

Maybe related to https://github.com/algesten/ureq/issues/637. I suspect this issue may involve the network setting of your machine. Can you checkout https://github.com/aome510/hackernews-TUI/tree/100-debug and run cargo run to see if there is a panic? The difference between that branch and latest main is

 fn main() {
+    let d = ureq::head("https://google.com").call().unwrap();
+    println!("{d:?}");
+

@aome510 commented on GitHub (Dec 24, 2023): Maybe related to https://github.com/algesten/ureq/issues/637. I suspect this issue may involve the network setting of your machine. Can you checkout https://github.com/aome510/hackernews-TUI/tree/100-debug and run `cargo run` to see if there is a panic? The difference between that branch and latest `main` is ```diff fn main() { + let d = ureq::head("https://google.com").call().unwrap(); + println!("{d:?}"); + ```

kerem commented

2026-03-14 12:27:22 +03:00

Author

Owner

@phips commented on GitHub (Dec 24, 2023):

A ha! That might be it, yes. There is ipv6 on this machine too. Hmm. Frustrating that the module doesn't work with the transport the world is trying to move towards, isn't it? 🤔

I'll try disabling it and see if it plays ball. But ultimately that's not the correct answer. Of course, I appreciate that is not this project's doing - ureq needs to get with the status quo 😄

@phips commented on GitHub (Dec 24, 2023): <img width="938" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-24 at 15 23 03" src="https://github.com/aome510/hackernews-TUI/assets/329022/167718ba-4343-4159-812a-f59926643239"> A ha! That might be it, yes. There is ipv6 on this machine too. Hmm. Frustrating that the module doesn't work with the transport the world is trying to move towards, isn't it? 🤔 I'll try disabling it and see if it plays ball. But ultimately that's not the correct answer. Of course, I appreciate that is not this project's doing - ureq needs to get with the status quo 😄

kerem commented

2026-03-14 12:27:27 +03:00

Author

Owner

@aome510 commented on GitHub (Dec 24, 2023):

Thanks for confirmation. I can switch to https://docs.rs/reqwest/latest/reqwest/ if ureq has that limitation

@aome510 commented on GitHub (Dec 24, 2023): Thanks for confirmation. I can switch to https://docs.rs/reqwest/latest/reqwest/ if `ureq` has that limitation

kerem commented

2026-03-14 12:27:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@phips commented on GitHub (Dec 24, 2023):

Is reqwest a bigger library than ureq? I don't suppose it ultimately matters. Shame ureq has such a fundamental thing as ipv6 missing really, isn't it.

@phips commented on GitHub (Dec 24, 2023): Is reqwest a bigger library than ureq? I don't suppose it ultimately matters. Shame ureq has such a fundamental thing as ipv6 missing really, isn't it.

kerem commented

2026-03-14 12:27:37 +03:00

Author

Owner

@aome510 commented on GitHub (Dec 24, 2023):

Is reqwest a bigger library than ureq? I don't suppose it ultimately matters. Shame ureq has such a fundamental thing as ipv6 missing really, isn't it.

yeah, bigger and more dependencies. It's more popular and has more features as well. The main reason I chose ureq in the first place is that it's relatively minimal. Maybe, that's why it doesn't have a good support for ipv6.

@aome510 commented on GitHub (Dec 24, 2023): > Is reqwest a bigger library than ureq? I don't suppose it ultimately matters. Shame ureq has such a fundamental thing as ipv6 missing really, isn't it. yeah, bigger and more dependencies. It's more popular and has more features as well. The main reason I chose `ureq` in the first place is that it's relatively minimal. Maybe, that's why it doesn't have a good support for ipv6.

kerem commented

2026-03-14 12:27:43 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ryanmcgrath commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2024):

This may be resolved now since they deployed IPV6 support.

(The issue is primarily that ureq does not implement a happy-eyeballs type feature - i.e, it won't try both ipv4 and ipv6 at the same time and choose whichever one works.)

@ryanmcgrath commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2024): This may be resolved now since they [deployed IPV6 support](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39099065). (The issue is primarily that `ureq` does not implement a happy-eyeballs type feature - i.e, it won't try both ipv4 and ipv6 at the same time and choose whichever one works.)

kerem commented

2026-03-14 12:27:48 +03:00

Author

Owner

@aome510 commented on GitHub (Jan 27, 2024):

This may be resolved now since they deployed IPV6 support.

(The issue is primarily that ureq does not implement a happy-eyeballs type feature - i.e, it won't try both ipv4 and ipv6 at the same time and choose whichever one works.)

@phips can you try again with the new change? I haven't had a chance to switch to rewquest yet. If it works, maybe the switch is not needed.

@aome510 commented on GitHub (Jan 27, 2024): > This may be resolved now since they [deployed IPV6 support](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39099065). > > (The issue is primarily that `ureq` does not implement a happy-eyeballs type feature - i.e, it won't try both ipv4 and ipv6 at the same time and choose whichever one works.) @phips can you try again with the new change? I haven't had a chance to switch to `rewquest` yet. If it works, maybe the switch is not needed.

kerem commented

2026-03-14 12:27:53 +03:00

Author

Owner

@phips commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2024):

Sadly nope @aome510 — still the same 😢

@phips commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2024): Sadly nope @aome510 — still the same 😢 ![Screenshot 2024-01-28 at 12 50 48](https://github.com/aome510/hackernews-TUI/assets/329022/9f617254-162c-4664-be53-178a7e409bed)

kerem commented

2026-03-14 12:27:58 +03:00

Author

Owner

@phips commented on GitHub (Nov 17, 2024):

Just tested this with latest release, and it's working! 👏 Closing ticket…

@phips commented on GitHub (Nov 17, 2024): Just tested this with latest release, and it's working! 👏 Closing ticket…

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-14 12:29:35 +03:00

[PR #30] [MERGED] Replaced dirs with dirs-next #50