mirror of
https://github.com/RayLabsHQ/gitea-mirror.git
synced 2026-04-25 07:15:57 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #154] Feature Request: Having an "external" link for the local repository #73
Labels
No labels
bug
documentation
enhancement
help wanted
pull-request
question
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/gitea-mirror#73
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @arkangelll13 on GitHub (Nov 14, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/RayLabsHQ/gitea-mirror/issues/154
Originally assigned to: @arunavo4 on GitHub.
Currently there is a nice clickable link on the dashboard/repositories pages to easily open the local repo where the mirrored files go, this is using the "Gitea URL" to create the link. Is it possible to have an additional field here for the link generation, that is separate from the actual link used by the application to do the mirroring?
My scenario: I have a dedicated (docker) network for gitea and this is where I also put gitea-mirror. I also have a leg here for my reverse proxy and both containers are only available through that reverse proxy. But gitea-mirror is using the direct link to gitea, it does not goes through the proxy.
This way the gitea URL could be like it is for me right now: http://gitea-server:3000 and there could be an extra (optional!) field where the external link coud be for the gitea server: https://gitea.home.lab
@arunavo4 commented on GitHub (Nov 14, 2025):
@arkangelll13 yea I think this is useful will add this soon. If possible this weekend.
@arunavo4 commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2026):
Implemented in PR: https://github.com/RayLabsHQ/gitea-mirror/pull/183
What was added:
This should match the reverse-proxy/internal-network setup you described.