mirror of
https://github.com/flyimg/flyimg.git
synced 2026-04-25 01:35:56 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #1] Consider using GraphicsMagic instead of ImageMagik #3
Labels
No labels
Docs
Docs
Docs
Security
UnitTest
bug
dependencies
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
enhancement
hacktoberfest
help wanted
invalid
pull-request
question
stale
version 1
version 2
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/flyimg#3
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @baamenabar on GitHub (Mar 12, 2016).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/flyimg/flyimg/issues/1
My experience with GraphicsMagic has been far better than with ImageMagik, at least on a windows machine. But I haven't given it too complex tasks.
http://blog.trackduck.com/2014/11/12/imagemagick-vs-graphicsmagick-one-better-process-images-website/
many say in the web, that GraphicsMagis is faster. I'm not sure if the API is the same in every aspect. Again my limited experience says that they use have the same API.
@sadok-f commented on GitHub (Mar 13, 2016):
Thanks Agustin, what I realise from testing both GraphicsMagic and ImageMagik with Mozjpeg is almost the same result always, but didn't make a benchmark yet to see which one is faster.
I would like to make server configurable and we can switch between both library with just change on option in parameters.yml
I'll add the dependencies to Dockerfile to have GraphicsMagic also.
@baamenabar commented on GitHub (Mar 13, 2016):
Cool this way we can switch whenever neded. I was playing with Graphics magic and mozjpeg on the weekend and the performance is fantastic.
@sadok-f commented on GitHub (Jan 3, 2017):
won't fix