[GH-ISSUE #454] Issue with newParentFolder #339

Closed
opened 2026-02-25 22:36:51 +03:00 by kerem · 7 comments
Owner

Originally created by @cortopy on GitHub (Feb 25, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/floccusaddon/floccus/issues/454

Describe the bug
I've just started to get errors for one of my sync folders in Firefox (Chrome is ok).

To Reproduce
In Firefox, I have the following sync jobs with a nextcloud account:

  • From local "/Bookmarks Toolbar" to remote "/personal/Bookmarks Bar"
  • From local "/Bookmarks Menu" to remote "/personal/Bookmarks Menu"

The second one runs without an issue but the first one keeps outputting these two errors in the logs:

2020-02-25T09:52:39.301Z (nextcloud-folders)MOVEFOLDER { id: '1905', parentId: undefined }
2020-02-25T09:52:39.432Z Syncing failed with newParentFolder is undefined

Expected behavior
All jobs sync ok

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Linux Manjaro
  • Browser Firefox
  • Browser Version 73.0b11
  • Floccus version: 3.5.3
  • Floccus sync method: nextcloud

Server (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Ubuntu
  • Nextcloud version: 18.0.1
  • Bookmarks app version: 2.3.4
Originally created by @cortopy on GitHub (Feb 25, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/floccusaddon/floccus/issues/454 **Describe the bug** I've just started to get errors for one of my sync folders in Firefox (Chrome is ok). **To Reproduce** In Firefox, I have the following sync jobs with a nextcloud account: - From local "/Bookmarks Toolbar" to remote "/personal/Bookmarks Bar" - From local "/Bookmarks Menu" to remote "/personal/Bookmarks Menu" The second one runs without an issue but the first one keeps outputting these two errors in the logs: ``` 2020-02-25T09:52:39.301Z (nextcloud-folders)MOVEFOLDER { id: '1905', parentId: undefined } 2020-02-25T09:52:39.432Z Syncing failed with newParentFolder is undefined ``` **Expected behavior** All jobs sync ok **Desktop (please complete the following information):** - OS: Linux Manjaro - Browser Firefox - Browser Version 73.0b11 - Floccus version: 3.5.3 - Floccus sync method: nextcloud **Server (please complete the following information):** - OS: Ubuntu - Nextcloud version: 18.0.1 - Bookmarks app version: 2.3.4
kerem 2026-02-25 22:36:51 +03:00
  • closed this issue
  • added the
    bug
    label
Author
Owner

@marcelklehr commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2020):

Floccus sync method: nextcloud

This means you are using the legacy method which creates tags on the server. Is this correct?

In any case, I would like to persuade you to

a) switch from the legacy method to the one using folders, which fixes some syncing problems already
b) try out the v4 pre-release to see if this is fixed in the upcoming release (which I think it is), after doing a backup, of course!

<!-- gh-comment-id:590876302 --> @marcelklehr commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2020): > Floccus sync method: nextcloud This means you are using the legacy method which creates tags on the server. Is this correct? In any case, I would like to persuade you to a) [switch](https://github.com/marcelklehr/floccus#switching-from-tag-based-to-folder-based-syncing) from the legacy method to the one using folders, which fixes some syncing problems already b) try out the v4 pre-release to see if this is fixed in the upcoming release (which I think it is), after doing a backup, of course!
Author
Owner

@cortopy commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2020):

thanks @marcelklehr for looking into this! I'm already using the new api. Or at least I think so. When I go into the options of my sync jobs the title is "nextcloud-folders options". Isn't that the new method?

<!-- gh-comment-id:590889479 --> @cortopy commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2020): thanks @marcelklehr for looking into this! I'm already using the new api. Or at least I think so. When I go into the options of my sync jobs the title is "nextcloud-folders options". Isn't that the new method?
Author
Owner

@marcelklehr commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2020):

@cortopy Yes, that's good. One less thing to worry about!

<!-- gh-comment-id:590890229 --> @marcelklehr commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2020): @cortopy Yes, that's good. One less thing to worry about!
Author
Owner

@cortopy commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2020):

but it's not working?

<!-- gh-comment-id:590968188 --> @cortopy commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2020): but it's not working?
Author
Owner

@marcelklehr commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2020):

In any case, I would like to persuade you to
[...]
b) try out the v4 pre-release to see if this is fixed in the upcoming release (which I think it is), after doing a backup, of course!

<!-- gh-comment-id:590996715 --> @marcelklehr commented on GitHub (Feb 25, 2020): > In any case, I would like to persuade you to > [...] > *b)* try out the v4 pre-release to see if this is fixed in the upcoming release (which I think it is), after doing a backup, of course!
Author
Owner

@marcelklehr commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2020):

I'm happy to announce the release of v4.0.0 which should fix this issue as well. Thanks for being patient :) And please shout if this should come up again.

<!-- gh-comment-id:593402565 --> @marcelklehr commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2020): I'm happy to announce the release of v4.0.0 which should fix this issue as well. Thanks for being patient :) And please shout if this should come up again.
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2023):

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1477257395 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2023): This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/floccus#339
No description provided.