mirror of
https://github.com/floccusaddon/floccus.git
synced 2026-04-25 22:26:06 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #244] Feature Request: One way sync #237
Labels
No labels
browser-specific
bug
correctness issues
enhancement
feature: Google Drive
feature: Linkwarden
feature: git
feature: nextcloud-bookmarks
feature: tabs
feature: webdav
help wanted
native-app
priority: high
priority: low
priority: medium
pull-request
question
question
stale
upstream
waiting for more information
wontfix
🙁 Not following issue template
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/floccus#237
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @a575606 on GitHub (Mar 22, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/floccusaddon/floccus/issues/244
I'm trying to find the best setup for syncing bookmarks between Nextcloud and Chrome and Firefox on my two Win10 pc's and Firefox on my Android phone.
In addition to Floccus, I set up a Firefox Sync Server, which allows me to sync between Win10 and Android Firefox. That works great for Firefox, but because Firefox sync breaks Floccus, I have had to disable Floccus for the time being.
Ideally I'd like to keep Nextcloud and Chrome synced as well, but I understand the challenges around multiple syncs on the same data.
One idea I had to get around the problem was having one directional sync. I.e, adding the option to only push to or only pull from Nextcloud, for a given brownser, in addition to the current bidirectional sync option.
Uni directional sync shouldn't create conflicts with browser sync if it's set only to push changes. So, from Firefox I could push changes to Nextcloud and pull them to Chrome. Meanwhile Firefox would stay in sync via browser sync.
Do you think that could work? Perhaps it's something I could help with coding if you think it's a useful idea?
@Magissia commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2019):
That would solve lot of problems.
@bernd-wechner commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2019):
I certainly like the idea of being able to set any instance of floccus into "Slave" mode,, only taking updates from the server. It would be equally good to be able to temporarily change that. To say add a bookmark on a Slave save then sync it up. In the ideal (I do dream) that would be on a bookmark by bookmark basis. I could select a bookmark as say "Yes, this is Slave instance of floccus, but this one bookmark, push it to the server".
@maverick74 commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2019):
Count me as super interested in this as well!!!
@eleksis commented on GitHub (Jun 29, 2019):
This feture..to have push/pull buttons..would be super helpful. Is this on horizon?
Often i want to clean my bookmarks on one device, push to server and on other devices pull/override instead of merge.
@marcelklehr commented on GitHub (Jun 29, 2019):
Sorry for not responding earlier. This is definitely on the horizon. Some code on is already done, but still unreleased. It'll be a few weeks until I get back to the bookmarks/floccus ecosystem, though.
@marcelklehr commented on GitHub (Jul 4, 2019):
I polished the code that's already done on this and made it available for testing as v3.4.0-beta.1. It's only the slave mode for now. Feel free to give this a try and provide feedback :) (Don't forget your backups! 😄)
@marcelklehr commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2019):
Feel free to try our this feature in the latest beta
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2023):
This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.