[GH-ISSUE #344] can i use this on production, as GCS replacement #66

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-03 12:07:57 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:07:57 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @batara666 on GitHub (Oct 19, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fsouza/fake-gcs-server/issues/344

Originally created by @batara666 on GitHub (Oct 19, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fsouza/fake-gcs-server/issues/344

kerem

2026-03-03 12:07:57 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
question
label

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:07:58 +03:00

Author

Owner

@fsouza commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2020):

You certainly can, but definitely shouldn't. This is designed for tests and given its intent, I find it unlikely that I would take PRs improving fake-gcs-server as a real world replacement to GCS.

For production, you could in theory use some open source object store, such as minio or Swift, as long as you stick with the S3 API (iirc GCS has partial support for the S3 API).

@fsouza commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2020): You certainly _can_, but definitely shouldn't. This is designed for tests and given its intent, I find it unlikely that I would take PRs improving fake-gcs-server as a real world replacement to GCS. For production, you could in theory use some open source object store, such as minio or Swift, as long as you stick with the S3 API (iirc GCS has partial support for the S3 API).

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:07:58 +03:00

Author

Owner

@batara666 commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2020):

i got 15TB on my storage, i may use it just 60% of total, is that okay ?

@batara666 commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2020): i got 15TB on my storage, i may use it just 60% of total, is that okay ?

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-03 12:10:12 +03:00

[PR #66] [MERGED] build(deps): bump alpine from 3.10.1 to 3.10.2 #310