[GH-ISSUE #198] python gcs client use generation as 0 when it is None, which is not supported/implemented yet. #31

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-03 12:07:36 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:07:36 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @kc-panw on GitHub (Mar 20, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fsouza/fake-gcs-server/issues/198

GCS client forms the GET url with param generation=0 which is not implemented in the server.
So, if it's not implemented, the quick fix may be replacing all

if generationStr != ""

if generationStr != "" && generationStr != "0"

so that it uses Server.GetObject()

otherwise, get/download object will fail. We can easily reproduce this by running example code.

Just wonder if GetObjectWithGeneration() will be implemented soon or any other better fix?

Originally created by @kc-panw on GitHub (Mar 20, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fsouza/fake-gcs-server/issues/198 GCS client forms the GET url with param `generation=0` which is not implemented in the server. So, if it's not implemented, the quick fix may be replacing all `if generationStr != ""` to `if generationStr != "" && generationStr != "0"` so that it uses `Server.GetObject()` otherwise, get/download object will fail. We can easily reproduce this by running example code. Just wonder if `GetObjectWithGeneration()` will be implemented soon or any other better fix?

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-03 12:07:36 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:07:37 +03:00

Author

Owner

@fsouza commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2020):

Hi @kc-panw, thanks for reporting and sorry for the delayed response. There aren't any plans for implementing GetObjectWithGeneration() at the moment, unfortunately.

Regarding generation being 0, I just pushed a fix.

@fsouza commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2020): Hi @kc-panw, thanks for reporting and sorry for the delayed response. There aren't any plans for implementing `GetObjectWithGeneration()` at the moment, unfortunately. Regarding generation being 0, I just pushed a fix.

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:07:37 +03:00

Author

Owner

@linjun9 commented on GitHub (May 6, 2020):

Hi @fsouza, I ran into the same issue again by running the python sample code. The problem is you only update the getObject function, but there are rewriteObject and downloadObject as well.

Is there a reason that you don't want to update those two functions? Thanks in advance.

@linjun9 commented on GitHub (May 6, 2020): Hi @fsouza, I ran into the same issue again by running the python sample code. The problem is you only update the `getObject` function, but there are `rewriteObject` and `downloadObject` as well. Is there a reason that you don't want to update those two functions? Thanks in advance.

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:07:37 +03:00

Author

Owner

@fsouza commented on GitHub (May 6, 2020):

It was an oversight. Will push a fix, thanks for pinging me!

@fsouza commented on GitHub (May 6, 2020): It was an oversight. Will push a fix, thanks for pinging me!

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-03 12:10:03 +03:00

[PR #31] [MERGED] chore(deps): update module google.golang.org/api to v0.5.0 #279