[GH-ISSUE #159] [BUG] Range Reader returning wrong bytes #27

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-03 12:07:31 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:07:31 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @ls-tommy-baloukas on GitHub (Jan 7, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fsouza/fake-gcs-server/issues/159

I am currently using the fakestorage package in my project to unit test my GCS code. It seems like calling NewRangeReader(ctx, offset, length) returns the wrong bytes depending on what I pass in as offset and length. For example, say I have a GCS Object that contains the following text: "Hello There!" and my goal is to read this file in chunks until the entire file is read, I would get get the following => "Hlotee" if I chunk the reads by 2 bytes starting from 0 to EOF.

I tested my code with a real GCS instance, and I get the correct data back after reading in chunks (2 byte size), so this seems to be related to the fakestorage package.

Originally created by @ls-tommy-baloukas on GitHub (Jan 7, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fsouza/fake-gcs-server/issues/159 I am currently using the fakestorage package in my project to unit test my GCS code. It seems like calling NewRangeReader(ctx, offset, length) returns the wrong bytes depending on what I pass in as offset and length. For example, say I have a GCS Object that contains the following text: "Hello There!" and my goal is to read this file in chunks until the entire file is read, I would get get the following => "Hlotee" if I chunk the reads by 2 bytes starting from 0 to EOF. I tested my code with a real GCS instance, and I get the correct data back after reading in chunks (2 byte size), so this seems to be related to the fakestorage package.

kerem

2026-03-03 12:07:31 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
stale
label

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:07:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@fsouza commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2020):

Hi @ls-tommy-baloukas, thanks for reporting and apologies for the delayed response. Let's fix this :)

Can you share a reproducer so we can use it as a test to prevent regressions?

@fsouza commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2020): Hi @ls-tommy-baloukas, thanks for reporting and apologies for the delayed response. Let's fix this :) Can you share a reproducer so we can use it as a test to prevent regressions?

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:07:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@fsouza commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2021):

Closing as stale.

@fsouza commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2021): Closing as stale.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-03 12:10:01 +03:00

[PR #27] [CLOSED] chore(deps): update module google.golang.org/api to v0.3.2 - autoclosed #276