starred/fake-gcs-server

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/fsouza/fake-gcs-server.git synced 2026-04-25 13:45:52 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #852] Support XML Multipart uploads? #139

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-03 12:08:38 +03:00 by kerem · 5 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:08:38 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @wjones127 on GitHub (Jul 9, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fsouza/fake-gcs-server/issues/852

We are looking at integration testing with this server for object_store_rs and are implementing bindings for the XML Multipart upload. It would be nice to be able to test those methods with this server.

Is this repo open to contributions? If so I'd be willing to attempt a PR.

Originally created by @wjones127 on GitHub (Jul 9, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fsouza/fake-gcs-server/issues/852 We are looking at integration testing with this server for object_store_rs and are implementing bindings for the [XML Multipart upload](https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/multipart-uploads). It would be nice to be able to test those methods with this server. Is this repo open to contributions? If so I'd be willing to attempt a PR.

kerem added the

enhancement

label

2026-03-03 12:08:38 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:08:39 +03:00

Author

Owner

@fsouza commented on GitHub (Jul 15, 2022):

We are looking at integration testing with this server for object_store_rs and are implementing bindings for the XML Multipart upload. It would be nice to be able to test those methods with this server.

Hey, yeah, feel free to send a PR. I'm not that familiar with the XML APIs, but we can work on it together.

@fsouza commented on GitHub (Jul 15, 2022): > We are looking at integration testing with this server for object_store_rs and are implementing bindings for the [XML Multipart upload](https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/multipart-uploads). It would be nice to be able to test those methods with this server. Hey, yeah, feel free to send a PR. I'm not that familiar with the XML APIs, but we can work on it together.

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:08:39 +03:00

Author

Owner

@zacker150 commented on GitHub (Jan 11, 2023):

Is this still on the roadmap?

@zacker150 commented on GitHub (Jan 11, 2023): Is this still on the roadmap?

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:08:39 +03:00

Author

Owner

@wjones127 commented on GitHub (Jan 11, 2023):

Apologies, I don't think I'll be getting to this anytime soon.

@wjones127 commented on GitHub (Jan 11, 2023): Apologies, I don't think I'll be getting to this anytime soon.

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:08:39 +03:00

Author

Owner

@fsouza commented on GitHub (Jan 11, 2023):

@zacker150 I don't have many free cycles right now, but I'll leave this issue open in case other folks want to work on this. Thank you very much for checking in!

@fsouza commented on GitHub (Jan 11, 2023): @zacker150 I don't have many free cycles right now, but I'll leave this issue open in case other folks want to work on this. Thank you very much for checking in!

kerem commented

2026-03-03 12:08:39 +03:00

Author

Owner

@goober commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2023):

I have an implementation almost ready for review. Just want to make sure that my first PR for listing objects using the XML api get merged before.

@goober commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2023): I have an implementation almost ready for review. Just want to make sure that my first PR for listing objects using the XML api get merged before.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-03 12:29:42 +03:00

[PR #139] [MERGED] internal/backend: keep raw []storage.ACL in backend.Object #372