starred/esp8266_deauther

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/SpacehuhnTech/esp8266_deauther.git synced 2026-04-26 00:05:55 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #98] Spam WOL packets #67

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-27 23:22:51 +03:00 by kerem · 6 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 23:22:51 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @Hammad1029 on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/SpacehuhnTech/esp8266_deauther/issues/98

Just like spamming deauth packets, is it possible to spam WOL(wake on lan) packets? add it please # #

Originally created by @Hammad1029 on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/SpacehuhnTech/esp8266_deauther/issues/98 Just like spamming deauth packets, is it possible to spam WOL(wake on lan) packets? add it please # #

kerem

2026-02-27 23:22:51 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
feature request

wontfix
labels

kerem commented

2026-02-27 23:22:52 +03:00

Author

Owner

@joneroy commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017):

@Hammad1029

I think it's complicated feature "Spam WOL packets"

@joneroy commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017): @Hammad1029 I think it's complicated feature "Spam WOL packets"

kerem commented

2026-02-27 23:22:52 +03:00

Author

Owner

@spacehuhn commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017):

How should you send wake on lan packets without knowing the mac of the target?

@spacehuhn commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017): How should you send wake on lan packets without knowing the mac of the target?

kerem commented

2026-02-27 23:22:52 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Hammad1029 commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017):

by scanning the ap? scanning the ap currently and going on the clients does reveal the client address.

@Hammad1029 commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017): by scanning the ap? scanning the ap currently and going on the clients does reveal the client address.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 23:22:52 +03:00

Author

Owner

@spacehuhn commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017):

yes, active devices! ...devices which doens't care about WOL packets you send them.

@spacehuhn commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017): yes, active devices! ...devices which doens't care about WOL packets you send them.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 23:22:52 +03:00

Author

Owner

@spacehuhn commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017):

You can't scan for sleeping devices. You'd need to preset the MACs and at this point you'd probably have physical access and don't need to send these packets. I don't see the use for this project.

@spacehuhn commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2017): You can't scan for sleeping devices. You'd need to preset the MACs and at this point you'd probably have physical access and don't need to send these packets. I don't see the use for this project.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 23:22:52 +03:00

Author

Owner

@N0vaPixel commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2017):

You're probably talking about "wake on wireless lan"

Like @spacehuhn said you need to know your targets
WOL packets are often protected
Like WOL, to use WOWLAN technology you must be connected to an AP.

Sorry but we can't do anything. The soft is not designed to connect to an AP.
Thanks you for helping us to find new ideas :)

@N0vaPixel commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2017): You're probably talking about "wake on wireless lan" + Like @spacehuhn said you need to know your targets + WOL packets are often protected + Like WOL, to use WOWLAN technology you must be connected to an AP. Sorry but we can't do anything. The soft is not designed to connect to an AP. Thanks you for helping us to find new ideas :)