mirror of
https://github.com/SpacehuhnTech/esp8266_deauther.git
synced 2026-04-26 00:05:55 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #750] Request Packet Monitor and Deauther Detector #286
Labels
No labels
best of
bug
development
discussion
documentation
duplicate
feature request
help wanted
help wanted
improvement
pinned
pull-request
question
stale
translation
v3
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/esp8266_deauther#286
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @ChandraOrbit on GitHub (Mar 27, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/SpacehuhnTech/esp8266_deauther/issues/750
thanks
@marek26340 commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2018):
Read the wiki please :)
@tobozo commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2018):
Packet Monitor in the Web GUI: it's easy to do with u8glib and shouldn't be a problem to achieve with the current library.
The real underlying problem is the load on the ESP. Adding too much polling to the webserver increases the probability it'll crash.
The only way I can think about to have screencap without impacting the stability would be to send the 1Kb along with every JSON response the server does, and let JavaScript draw something out of it.
@spacehuhn commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2018):
The problem is that you can't have an access point open and host a web server while sniffing WiFi.
It's like with every other WiFi card. Either you use it as an access point to host a network, as a station to connect to one or you put it in the monitor mode to sniff for packets. But you can't have everything at the same time.
@tobozo commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2018):
doh!
@spacehuhn commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2018):
Using 2 ESPs could solve that ;)
@tobozo commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2018):
yep, keeping the idea for when I'll manage to flash an ESP8266 from an ESP32 :-)
@ChandraOrbit commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2018):
I agree if there are 2 ESPs in 1 board, so the esp8266_deauther software feature, packet monitoring and deauther detection can be explored, the container is concise and does not reduce user portability as well as convenience.
@lspoplove commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2018):
After I upgrade all my products I can consider designing such board with 2 ESPs
@spacehuhn commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2018):
The problem with 2 ESPs is, how would they communicate?
Via serial? That will make problems when trying to flash them! Unless there is some on/off switch for the serial lines.
Better would be a i2c or spi connection but I never programmed something like that, so no idea how much work that would be.
@tobozo commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2018):
[edit] ESP32 has two HardwareSerial interfaces, so using an ESP32 as the flasher device removes the Serial limitation.
I have only tried serial so far, with partial success.
SPI version (untested yet): https://github.com/JiriBilek/WiFiSpiESP
Serial version (untested too): https://github.com/jeelabs/esp-link
@spacehuhn commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2018):
I'm going to close this because the main question got answered.
It isn't possible to add the packet-monitor or deauth-detector to the web interface just like that. You'd need custom hardware and modified software, a lot of work for something that already works without problems using a $3 display from China.