[GH-ISSUE #2088] Signature process web page rendering issue #599

Open
opened 2026-02-26 18:47:44 +03:00 by kerem · 5 comments
Owner

Originally created by @nfranke on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/documenso/documenso/issues/2088

Issue Description

When trying to sign a document via the document.com web page, the actual signature field is enormous and way, way down to the bottom left on the page.

Steps to Reproduce

Create PDF and use API to upload. Use API to send an email containing the signature link to the recipient. Click on the "View Document to sign" link and observe the issue.

Expected Behavior

No response

Current Behavior

No response

Screenshots (optional)

No response

Operating System [e.g., Windows 10]

No response

Browser [e.g., Chrome, Firefox]

No response

Version [e.g., 2.0.1]

No response

Please check the boxes that apply to this issue report.

  • I have searched the existing issues to make sure this is not a duplicate.
  • I have provided steps to reproduce the issue.
  • I have included relevant environment information.
  • I have included any relevant screenshots.
  • I understand that this is a voluntary contribution and that there is no guarantee of resolution.
  • I want to work on creating a PR for this issue if approved
Originally created by @nfranke on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/documenso/documenso/issues/2088 ### Issue Description When trying to sign a document via the document.com web page, the actual signature field is enormous and way, way down to the bottom left on the page. ### Steps to Reproduce Create PDF and use API to upload. Use API to send an email containing the signature link to the recipient. Click on the "View Document to sign" link and observe the issue. ### Expected Behavior _No response_ ### Current Behavior _No response_ ### Screenshots (optional) _No response_ ### Operating System [e.g., Windows 10] _No response_ ### Browser [e.g., Chrome, Firefox] _No response_ ### Version [e.g., 2.0.1] _No response_ ### Please check the boxes that apply to this issue report. - [ ] I have searched the existing issues to make sure this is not a duplicate. - [ ] I have provided steps to reproduce the issue. - [ ] I have included relevant environment information. - [ ] I have included any relevant screenshots. - [ ] I understand that this is a voluntary contribution and that there is no guarantee of resolution. - [ ] I want to work on creating a PR for this issue if approved
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025):

Thank you for opening your first issue and for being a part of the open signing revolution!

One of our team members will review it and get back to you as soon as it possible 💚

Meanwhile, please feel free to hop into our community in Discord

<!-- gh-comment-id:3430038780 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025): Thank you for opening your first issue and for being a part of the open signing revolution! <br /> One of our team members will review it and get back to you as soon as it possible 💚 <br /> Meanwhile, please feel free to hop into our community in [Discord](https://documen.so/discord)
Author
Owner

@nfranke commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025):

I may have a clue. The bounds of the document are basically ignored when placing fields. If you place one that's outside of the document's bounds, it acts very odd.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3430271748 --> @nfranke commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025): I may have a clue. The bounds of the document are basically ignored when placing fields. If you place one that's outside of the document's bounds, it acts very odd.
Author
Owner

@ephraimduncan commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025):

Hey @nfranke, I will investigate the document bounds issue, in the mean time, can I get the code you used for the API? That might help more in investigating the original issue.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3434184481 --> @ephraimduncan commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025): Hey @nfranke, I will investigate the document bounds issue, in the mean time, can I get the code you used for the API? That might help more in investigating the original issue.
Author
Owner

@nfranke commented on GitHub (Oct 23, 2025):

I rewrote my code, so I don't have that. Basically, I put a signature field at like 200,400 initially thinking that was in points. After fixing that, it seems fine. I had a simple 2-page PDF generated via iText in Java.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3437446439 --> @nfranke commented on GitHub (Oct 23, 2025): I rewrote my code, so I don't have that. Basically, I put a signature field at like 200,400 initially thinking that was in points. After fixing that, it seems fine. I had a simple 2-page PDF generated via iText in Java.
Author
Owner

@ephraimduncan commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025):

It should be in percentages, will open a pr to limit it between 0-100 to avoid this confusion in the future

<!-- gh-comment-id:3442684147 --> @ephraimduncan commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025): It should be in percentages, will open a pr to limit it between 0-100 to avoid this confusion in the future
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/documenso#599
No description provided.