starred/documenso

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/documenso/documenso.git synced 2026-04-25 13:55:59 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #1921] Signatures are not LTV enabled. #553

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-26 18:47:33 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-26 18:47:33 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @MohammadAbuzar945 on GitHub (Jul 24, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/documenso/documenso/issues/1921

Feature Description

Are you guys working on LTV enabled signatures which will be valid for a long run instead of expiring the day we bought the certificate.

Use Case

Proposed Solution

No response

Alternatives (optional)

No response

Additional Context

No response

Please check the boxes that apply to this feature request.

I have searched the existing feature requests to make sure this is not a duplicate.
I have provided a detailed description of the requested feature.
I have explained the use case or scenario for this feature.
I have included any relevant technical details or design suggestions.
I understand that this is a suggestion and that there is no guarantee of implementation.
I want to work on creating a PR for this issue if approved

Originally created by @MohammadAbuzar945 on GitHub (Jul 24, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/documenso/documenso/issues/1921 ### Feature Description Are you guys working on LTV enabled signatures which will be valid for a long run instead of expiring the day we bought the certificate. ### Use Case <img width="546" height="160" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7f720dd8-d8b7-41fc-8131-e81aaaf065e6" /> ### Proposed Solution _No response_ ### Alternatives (optional) _No response_ ### Additional Context _No response_ ### Please check the boxes that apply to this feature request. - [ ] I have searched the existing feature requests to make sure this is not a duplicate. - [ ] I have provided a detailed description of the requested feature. - [ ] I have explained the use case or scenario for this feature. - [ ] I have included any relevant technical details or design suggestions. - [ ] I understand that this is a suggestion and that there is no guarantee of implementation. - [ ] I want to work on creating a PR for this issue if approved

kerem added the

status: triage

label

2026-02-26 18:47:33 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-02-26 18:47:34 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ArbiterGR commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2025):

Any news on that one? LTV support is important for long term validity and storage of documents.

@ArbiterGR commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2025): Any news on that one? LTV support is important for long term validity and storage of documents.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 18:47:34 +03:00

Author

Owner

@MohammadAbuzar945 commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2025):

We are also waiting for that feature.

From: ArbiterGR @.>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2025 5:27 PM
To: documenso/documenso @.>
Cc: Mohammad Abuzar @.>; Author @.>
Subject: Re: [documenso/documenso] Signatures are not LTV enabled. (Issue #1921)

[https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3236764?s=20&v=4]ArbiterGR left a comment (documenso/documenso#1921)https://github.com/documenso/documenso/issues/1921#issuecomment-3467748477

Any news on that one? LTV support is important for long term validity and storage of documents.

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/documenso/documenso/issues/1921#issuecomment-3467748477, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANF63KRQAZD5DATKNLKHWOT32H72FAVCNFSM6AAAAACCITD6FOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTINRXG42DQNBXG4.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

@MohammadAbuzar945 commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2025): We are also waiting for that feature. ________________________________ From: ArbiterGR ***@***.***> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2025 5:27 PM To: documenso/documenso ***@***.***> Cc: Mohammad Abuzar ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [documenso/documenso] Signatures are not LTV enabled. (Issue #1921) [https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3236764?s=20&v=4]ArbiterGR left a comment (documenso/documenso#1921)<https://github.com/documenso/documenso/issues/1921#issuecomment-3467748477> Any news on that one? LTV support is important for long term validity and storage of documents. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://github.com/documenso/documenso/issues/1921#issuecomment-3467748477>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANF63KRQAZD5DATKNLKHWOT32H72FAVCNFSM6AAAAACCITD6FOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTINRXG42DQNBXG4>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

kerem commented

2026-02-26 18:47:34 +03:00

Author

Owner

@MohammadAbuzar945 commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2025):

Any update on it yet ?

@MohammadAbuzar945 commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2025): Any update on it yet ?

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-26 19:31:34 +03:00

[PR #553] [MERGED] chore: upgrade to latest next.js version #1039

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/documenso#553

No description provided.

Rows
Columns