[GH-ISSUE #1137] Rename document access "None" to "No restrictions" #328

Closed
opened 2026-02-26 18:46:32 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @raikasdev on GitHub (May 1, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/documenso/documenso/issues/1137

Originally assigned to: @raikasdev on GitHub.

Describe the improvement you are suggesting in detail

The word "none" for the access just feels weird. Feels like no-one has access to it 😄

image

This is why I suggest renaming it to "Anyone with the link" like Google Docs has:
image

EDIT: Changed my mind to "No restrictions" as per comment

Additional Information & Alternatives (optional)

No response

Do you want to work on this improvement?

Yes

Please check the boxes that apply to this improvement suggestion.

  • I have searched the existing issues and improvement suggestions to avoid duplication.
  • I have provided a clear description of the improvement being suggested.
  • I have explained the rationale behind this improvement.
  • I have included any relevant technical details or design suggestions.
  • I understand that this is a suggestion and that there is no guarantee of implementation.
Originally created by @raikasdev on GitHub (May 1, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/documenso/documenso/issues/1137 Originally assigned to: @raikasdev on GitHub. ### Describe the improvement you are suggesting in detail The word "none" for the access just feels weird. Feels like no-one has access to it :smile: ![image](https://github.com/documenso/documenso/assets/29684625/96a12a64-092f-45a8-a629-c5c121eba911) This is why I suggest renaming it to "Anyone with the link" like Google Docs has: ![image](https://github.com/documenso/documenso/assets/29684625/2f4352bb-a56d-45af-93b1-53d6d1f4cced) **EDIT**: Changed my mind to "No restrictions" as per [comment](https://github.com/documenso/documenso/pull/1138#issuecomment-2099723958) ### Additional Information & Alternatives (optional) _No response_ ### Do you want to work on this improvement? Yes ### Please check the boxes that apply to this improvement suggestion. - [X] I have searched the existing issues and improvement suggestions to avoid duplication. - [X] I have provided a clear description of the improvement being suggested. - [X] I have explained the rationale behind this improvement. - [X] I have included any relevant technical details or design suggestions. - [X] I understand that this is a suggestion and that there is no guarantee of implementation.
kerem 2026-02-26 18:46:32 +03:00
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 1, 2024):

Thank you for opening your first issue and for being a part of the open signing revolution!

One of our team members will review it and get back to you as soon as it possible 💚

Meanwhile, please feel free to hop into our community in Discord

<!-- gh-comment-id:2089139701 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 1, 2024): Thank you for opening your first issue and for being a part of the open signing revolution! <br /> One of our team members will review it and get back to you as soon as it possible 💚 <br /> Meanwhile, please feel free to hop into our community in [Discord](https://documen.so/discord)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/documenso#328
No description provided.