[GH-ISSUE #900] feat: sign in with passkey #274

Closed
opened 2026-02-26 18:46:15 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @anikdhabal on GitHub (Feb 2, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/documenso/documenso/issues/900

Feature Description

Add passkey support for logging in through Passkeys. Hanko is on my mind. right now as a client.

Screenshot 2024-02-02 185755

Use Case

No response

Proposed Solution

No response

Alternatives (optional)

No response

Additional Context

No response

Please check the boxes that apply to this feature request.

  • I have searched the existing feature requests to make sure this is not a duplicate.
  • I have provided a detailed description of the requested feature.
  • I have explained the use case or scenario for this feature.
  • I have included any relevant technical details or design suggestions.
  • I understand that this is a suggestion and that there is no guarantee of implementation.
  • I want to work on creating a PR for this issue if approved
Originally created by @anikdhabal on GitHub (Feb 2, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/documenso/documenso/issues/900 ### Feature Description Add passkey support for logging in through Passkeys. Hanko is on my mind. right now as a client. ![Screenshot 2024-02-02 185755](https://github.com/documenso/documenso/assets/81948346/6104ba5d-6c8b-4227-999a-413d794285a3) ### Use Case _No response_ ### Proposed Solution _No response_ ### Alternatives (optional) _No response_ ### Additional Context _No response_ ### Please check the boxes that apply to this feature request. - [X] I have searched the existing feature requests to make sure this is not a duplicate. - [ ] I have provided a detailed description of the requested feature. - [ ] I have explained the use case or scenario for this feature. - [ ] I have included any relevant technical details or design suggestions. - [ ] I understand that this is a suggestion and that there is no guarantee of implementation. - [X] I want to work on creating a PR for this issue if approved
Author
Owner

@anikdhabal commented on GitHub (Feb 2, 2024):

I want to work on creating a PR for this issue if approved

<!-- gh-comment-id:1923818062 --> @anikdhabal commented on GitHub (Feb 2, 2024): I want to work on creating a PR for this issue if approved
Author
Owner

@dguyen commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2024):

Hi @anikdhabal, sorry but this is something we're already looking at internally (for logging in and for signing fields) since it's required for certain compliances.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1926191135 --> @dguyen commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2024): Hi @anikdhabal, sorry but this is something we're already looking at internally (for logging in and for signing fields) since it's required for certain compliances.
Author
Owner

@anikdhabal commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2024):

Hi @anikdhabal, sorry but this is something we're already looking at internally (for logging in and for signing fields) since it's required for certain compliances.

Okk.

When the Teams feature is ready for users, we can definitely add the feature to sign in with SAML. And I would love to contribute to it.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1926346270 --> @anikdhabal commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2024): > Hi @anikdhabal, sorry but this is something we're already looking at internally (for logging in and for signing fields) since it's required for certain compliances. Okk. When the Teams feature is ready for users, we can definitely add the feature to sign in with SAML. And I would love to contribute to it.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/documenso#274
No description provided.