[GH-ISSUE #230] Add Docker support to the repo #67

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-16 12:23:19 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment

kerem commented

2026-03-16 12:23:19 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @ganeshpatil386386 on GitHub (Aug 26, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/docs/issues/230

Hey HoppScotch Team,
The idea is to add Docker support to the repo for quick and easy contributor setup.
Meanwhile, The setup of the repo is straightforward with Mintlify.

I recently faced an issue with the Node version while setting up the docs repo on my local machine that's why this could be a better solution. I'm not sure if this is something the Hoppscothch team is looking for as a contribution, but I'm happy to work on this issue.

@liyasthomas @SanskritiHarmukh @thetronjohnson

Originally created by @ganeshpatil386386 on GitHub (Aug 26, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hoppscotch/docs/issues/230 Hey HoppScotch Team, The idea is to add **Docker support** to the repo for quick and easy contributor setup. Meanwhile, The setup of the repo is straightforward with **Mintlify**. I recently faced an issue with the **Node version** while setting up the docs repo on my local machine that's why this could be a better solution. I'm not sure if this is something the Hoppscothch team is looking for as a contribution, but I'm happy to work on this issue. @liyasthomas @SanskritiHarmukh @thetronjohnson

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-16 12:23:24 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-16 12:23:30 +03:00

Author

Owner

@SanskritiHarmukh commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2024):

Hey @ganeshpatil386386 , thank you for your suggestion. At the moment, we're not planning to proceed with this idea because we believe containerizing the repo isn’t a necessary step right now. Most of the documentation updates are handled by the team, and the repo currently has a relatively small number of contributors. However, we’ll definitely consider revisiting this idea if the need arises in the future.

@SanskritiHarmukh commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2024): Hey @ganeshpatil386386 , thank you for your suggestion. At the moment, we're not planning to proceed with this idea because we believe containerizing the repo isn’t a necessary step right now. Most of the documentation updates are handled by the team, and the repo currently has a relatively small number of contributors. However, we’ll definitely consider revisiting this idea if the need arises in the future.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-16 12:29:06 +03:00

[PR #67] [CLOSED] Bump terser from 4.8.0 to 4.8.1 #153