[PR #62] DO without EDNS #82

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-14 01:12:25 +03:00 by kerem · 0 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-14 01:12:25 +03:00

Owner

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/ameshkov/dnslookup/pull/62
Author: @mohshami
Created: 1/27/2024
Status: 🔄 Open

Base: master ← Head: DNSSEC-without-EDNS

📝 Commits (1)

ea2e927 Allow setting the DO flag without having to explicitly enable an EDNS option

📊 Changes

1 file changed (+2 additions, -3 deletions)

View changed files

📝 main.go (+2 -3)

📄 Description

Allow setting the do flag without having to explicitly enable an EDNS option.

Sometimes we would like to validate DNSSEC but not enable PADDING or any of the other options

Also this way padding won't override edns and they won't override subnet

_{🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.}

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/ameshkov/dnslookup/pull/62 **Author:** [@mohshami](https://github.com/mohshami) **Created:** 1/27/2024 **Status:** 🔄 Open **Base:** `master` ← **Head:** `DNSSEC-without-EDNS` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`ea2e927`](https://github.com/ameshkov/dnslookup/commit/ea2e9279993d74a31d4a2d04a976ae0fc819a94d) Allow setting the DO flag without having to explicitly enable an EDNS option ### 📊 Changes **1 file changed** (+2 additions, -3 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `main.go` (+2 -3) </details> ### 📄 Description Allow setting the do flag without having to explicitly enable an EDNS option. Sometimes we would like to validate DNSSEC but not enable PADDING or any of the other options Also this way padding won't override edns and they won't override subnet --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>