[GH-ISSUE #1863] 💬 [Question] Navigation is quite slow #728

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-25 21:35:46 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-25 21:35:46 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @elmuz on GitHub (Feb 14, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/1863

💬 Question

I would like to use Cypht as a replacement for Gmail (plus other email providers). At the moment, my main concern is related to speed during navigation.

Going back and forth between the email list and 'singe-fullscreen-message' page is very slow compared to Gmail interface. The same feeling you get when switching folder (like unread, spam, etc). When you have many emails to browse this feels like impractical. Basically, the 'progress bar' at the top of the page takes around 2 seconds (90% of the times, sometimes it is fast, like it uses the cache, but most of the times is ~2 sec).

My Cypht server is in the LAN (so in theory it could be even faster than gmail if email are already pre-loaded in the cache).

I am wondering if this is expected or maybe there is something misconfigured on my side. I am asking... Among the possible configuration designs (session manager, memcached vs redis vs db or whatever), which is the one that it is expected to provide the best user experience possible?

At the moment I am using the latest official docker image.
Thanks

Originally created by @elmuz on GitHub (Feb 14, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/1863    ## 💬 Question  I would like to use Cypht as a replacement for Gmail (plus other email providers). At the moment, my main concern is related to speed during navigation. Going back and forth between the email list and 'singe-fullscreen-message' page is very slow compared to Gmail interface. The same feeling you get when switching folder (like unread, spam, etc). When you have many emails to browse this feels like impractical. Basically, the 'progress bar' at the top of the page takes around 2 seconds (90% of the times, sometimes it is fast, like it uses the cache, but most of the times is ~2 sec). My Cypht server is in the LAN (so in theory it could be even faster than gmail if email are already pre-loaded in the cache). I am wondering if this is expected or maybe there is something misconfigured on my side. I am asking... Among the possible configuration designs (session manager, memcached vs redis vs db or whatever), which is the one that it is expected to provide the best user experience possible? At the moment I am using the latest official docker image. Thanks

kerem added the

question

label

2026-02-25 21:35:46 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-02-25 21:35:46 +03:00

Author

Owner

@TheNomad11 commented on GitHub (Feb 14, 2026):

For me it made a big speed difference to use Redis. I haven't tried Memcached, though

@TheNomad11 commented on GitHub (Feb 14, 2026): For me it made a big speed difference to use Redis. I haven't tried Memcached, though

kerem commented

2026-02-25 21:35:46 +03:00

Author

Owner

@IrAlfred commented on GitHub (Feb 17, 2026):

Hello @elmuz

We recommend using Redis to improve Cypht's performance. Here's our setup guide with Redis configuration example: https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/wiki/Cypht%E2%80%90Redis-setup

@IrAlfred commented on GitHub (Feb 17, 2026): Hello @elmuz We recommend using Redis to improve Cypht's performance. Here's our setup guide with Redis configuration example: https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/wiki/Cypht%E2%80%90Redis-setup

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-25 21:36:56 +03:00

[PR #728] [MERGED] Fixed Tiki-integration action request variable that interferes #1012