mirror of
https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht.git
synced 2026-04-25 13:05:53 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #1818] Add ARM64 (linux/arm64) Docker image support #716
Labels
No labels
2fa
I18N
PGP
Security
Security
account
advanced_search
advanced_search
announcement
api_login
authentication
awaiting feedback
blocker
bug
bug
bug
calendar
config
contacts
core
core
devops
docker
docs
duplicate
dynamic_login
enhancement
epic
feature
feeds
framework
github
github
gmail_contacts
good first issue
help wanted
history
history
imap
imap_folders
inline_message
installation
keyboard_shortcuts
keyboard_shortcuts
ldap_contacts
mobile
need-ssh-access
new module set
nux
pop3
profiles
pull-request
question
refactor
release
research
saved_searches
smtp
strategic
tags
tests
themes
website
wordpress
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/cypht#716
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @solanab on GitHub (Dec 29, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/1818
Summary
The official Docker image (
cypht/cypht) currently only supportslinux/amd64architecture. Running it on ARM64 hosts (e.g., Apple Silicon, AWS Graviton, Oracle Ampere) via QEMU emulation causes PHP-FPM to crash withSIGSEGV:Request
Please publish multi-arch Docker images that include
linux/arm64support.Suggested Implementation
The current Dockerfile already uses
--platform=$BUILDPLATFORM, but the published image is amd64-only. A simple fix would be to usedocker buildxwith multi-platform support:Workaround
Users can build a native ARM64 image locally:
This works perfectly - I've tested it on an ARM64 server (Oracle Cloud Ampere A1).
Environment
Thank you for considering this enhancement!
@marclaporte commented on GitHub (Dec 29, 2025):
Duplicate?
https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/1780
@IrAlfred commented on GitHub (Jan 10, 2026):
Yes ! We will apply this recommendation for the next release.
Thanks @solanab
@IrAlfred commented on GitHub (Jan 18, 2026):
Hello @solanab
The fix for this issue has been applied and we are closing the ticket. We recommend testing with the newly released Cypht 2.6.0. Please reopen if the problem occurs again in the latest version.