[GH-ISSUE #1307] Move to codeberg.org #624

Closed
opened 2026-02-25 21:35:31 +03:00 by kerem · 6 comments
Owner

Originally created by @cptsanifair on GitHub (Oct 31, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/1307

🗣 Suggestion

cypth is a LGPL Project and fits the specs of FOSS

Codeberg comes with a ton of features and is, as the project as self, open source and free 2 use for FOSS Projects. Codeberg is based on forgejo, Fork of gitea and works basicly like github - but Free and Open Source.

Key Features for cypth my be

The github Project can be easily migrated by a assistent including

Originally created by @cptsanifair on GitHub (Oct 31, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/1307 ## 🗣 Suggestion cypth is a LGPL Project and fits the specs of FOSS Codeberg comes with a ton of features and is, as the project as self, open source and free 2 use for FOSS Projects. Codeberg is based on forgejo, Fork of gitea and works basicly like github - but Free and Open Source. Key Features for cypth my be - Package Registry for Container (https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/user/packages/) - CI/CD with Woodpecker (similiar to githubs workspace) - (Web-)pages https://codeberg.page/ - Translations with weblate The github Project can be easily migrated by a assistent including
kerem closed this issue 2026-02-25 21:35:31 +03:00
Author
Owner

@marclaporte commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2024):

Thank you for the suggestion. I look forward to reading the opinions of various Cypht community members.

I have been keeping an eye on Forgejo. Soft fork, hard fork, etc.
https://forgejo.org/2024-02-forking-forward/

While on the topic, here is another interesting project in this space:
https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/fossil-v-git.wiki

<!-- gh-comment-id:2449687446 --> @marclaporte commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2024): Thank you for the suggestion. I look forward to reading the opinions of various Cypht community members. I have been keeping an eye on Forgejo. Soft fork, hard fork, etc. https://forgejo.org/2024-02-forking-forward/ While on the topic, here is another interesting project in this space: https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/fossil-v-git.wiki
Author
Owner

@cptsanifair commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2024):

the idea behind is more to expand the resources (package registry, ci/cd, translations) on one platform.

it can be helpful for docker builds, translations and and and...

<!-- gh-comment-id:2450265477 --> @cptsanifair commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2024): the idea behind is more to expand the resources (package registry, ci/cd, translations) on one platform. it can be helpful for docker builds, translations and and and...
Author
Owner

@marclaporte commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2024):

I am quite confident we can get all the funtionality we want/need from GitHub (possibly we need to combine with various other services). The key benefit of Forgejo (which powers Codeberg) is that we retain the full capability to self-host.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2450792371 --> @marclaporte commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2024): I am quite confident we can get all the funtionality we want/need from GitHub (possibly we need to combine with various other services). The key benefit of Forgejo (which powers Codeberg) is that we retain the full capability to self-host.
Author
Owner

@marclaporte commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2025):

For the record, I use Forgejo (which powers Codeberg.org) with my team, and all is well so far.

Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware integrates Cypht https://doc.tiki.org/Cypht and we use GitLab: https://gitlab.com/tikiwiki/tiki
It also works well. However, I think we would get more "at large" community contributions if we were on GitHub.

For Cypht:

  • given the efforts of any migration
  • and to be where the critical mass of Open Source developers are (and as of now, it's GitHub)
    I think it's better to stay where we are.
<!-- gh-comment-id:2764284032 --> @marclaporte commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2025): For the record, I use Forgejo (which powers Codeberg.org) with my team, and all is well so far. Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware integrates Cypht https://doc.tiki.org/Cypht and we use GitLab: https://gitlab.com/tikiwiki/tiki It also works well. However, I think we would get more "at large" community contributions if we were on GitHub. For Cypht: * given the efforts of any migration * and to be where the critical mass of Open Source developers are (and as of now, it's GitHub) I think it's better to stay where we are.
Author
Owner

@marclaporte commented on GitHub (Aug 20, 2025):

Closing this for now.

Ultimately, my heart is for more federation like https://forgefed.org/

<!-- gh-comment-id:3207196703 --> @marclaporte commented on GitHub (Aug 20, 2025): Closing this for now. Ultimately, my heart is for more federation like https://forgefed.org/
Author
Owner

@marclaporte commented on GitHub (Sep 13, 2025):

This being said, I am favorable to maintaining a mirror on Codeberg (if this is something they welcome)

<!-- gh-comment-id:3288551231 --> @marclaporte commented on GitHub (Sep 13, 2025): This being said, I am favorable to maintaining a mirror on Codeberg (if this is something they welcome)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/cypht#624
No description provided.