[GH-ISSUE #16] Compose page features #14

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-25 21:33:55 +03:00 by kerem · 5 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-25 21:33:55 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @jasonmunro on GitHub (Aug 14, 2015).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/16

Originally assigned to: @jasonmunro on GitHub.

The compose page is very limited right now, it needs:

Cc/Bcc support
attachments (once a system is built for that)
proper reply formatting
saving of sent message outside auto-save via Gmail
probably more

Originally created by @jasonmunro on GitHub (Aug 14, 2015). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/16 Originally assigned to: @jasonmunro on GitHub. The compose page is very limited right now, it needs: - Cc/Bcc support - attachments (once a system is built for that) - proper reply formatting - saving of sent message outside auto-save via Gmail - probably more

kerem

2026-02-25 21:33:55 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement
label

kerem commented

2026-02-25 21:33:55 +03:00

Author

Owner

@dumblob commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2015):

With proper reply formatting you meant among other things also Reply-To:?

@dumblob commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2015): With `proper reply formatting` you meant among other things also `Reply-To:`?

kerem commented

2026-02-25 21:33:55 +03:00

Author

Owner

@jasonmunro commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2015):

I was thinking more about the fact we are not correctly setting In-reply-to on the outbound message (this should be set to the original message-id header), and that we should be flipping the IMAP Answered flag on the original. If we are not properly setting Reply-to on the outbound message, then yes, lets include that :)

@jasonmunro commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2015): I was thinking more about the fact we are not correctly setting In-reply-to on the outbound message (this should be set to the original message-id header), and that we should be flipping the IMAP Answered flag on the original. If we are not properly setting Reply-to on the outbound message, then yes, lets include that :)

kerem commented

2026-02-25 21:33:55 +03:00

Author

Owner

@jasonmunro commented on GitHub (Sep 2, 2015):

Cc/Bcc support is done

@jasonmunro commented on GitHub (Sep 2, 2015): Cc/Bcc support is done

kerem commented

2026-02-25 21:33:55 +03:00

Author

Owner

@jasonmunro commented on GitHub (Sep 9, 2015):

in-reply-to and reply-to headers are now supported. reply-to is not settable currently, it just defaults to the From header values

@jasonmunro commented on GitHub (Sep 9, 2015): in-reply-to and reply-to headers are now supported. reply-to is not settable currently, it just defaults to the From header values

kerem commented

2026-02-25 21:33:55 +03:00

Author

Owner

@jasonmunro commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2015):

This is complete except for saving sent messages in an imap folder. I'm going to close this and open more specific issues for anything that remains.

@jasonmunro commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2015): This is complete except for saving sent messages in an imap folder. I'm going to close this and open more specific issues for anything that remains.