mirror of
https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht.git
synced 2026-04-25 04:56:03 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #152] Independent sending profiles #122
Labels
No labels
2fa
I18N
PGP
Security
Security
account
advanced_search
advanced_search
announcement
api_login
authentication
awaiting feedback
blocker
bug
bug
bug
calendar
config
contacts
core
core
devops
docker
docs
duplicate
dynamic_login
enhancement
epic
feature
feeds
framework
github
github
gmail_contacts
good first issue
help wanted
history
history
imap
imap_folders
inline_message
installation
keyboard_shortcuts
keyboard_shortcuts
ldap_contacts
mobile
need-ssh-access
new module set
nux
pop3
profiles
pull-request
question
refactor
release
research
saved_searches
smtp
strategic
tags
tests
themes
website
wordpress
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/cypht#122
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @pacien on GitHub (Nov 18, 2016).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cypht-org/cypht/issues/152
Originally assigned to: @jasonmunro on GitHub.
Hi!
It would be nice to be able to create profiles independently of incoming IMAP servers for sending emails with different identities, still linked to an outgoing SMTP server.
@conspacer commented on GitHub (Nov 23, 2016):
Yes, the ability to attach multiple identity profiles to an SMTP server is important
@jasonmunro commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2016):
Profiles need a major overhaul. I coded up what I thought would be useful initially, but it's buggy and requires some more thought about the overall design and site specific implementation requirements.
@jasonmunro commented on GitHub (Apr 6, 2017):
This is finally added to the master branch (this will not be in the release code, it didn't make the cut). Some highlights:
I'm going to close this out, if anybody runs into trouble or finds a bug, please open a new issue.
@conspacer commented on GitHub (Apr 18, 2017):
Thanks @jasonmunro Ill be testing this out, will update if anything.
@jasonmunro commented on GitHub (Apr 18, 2017):
@conspacer thanks for the testing - Feel free to re-open this issue or create a new one if you find anything amiss!
@jasonmunro commented on GitHub (Apr 18, 2017):
@conspacer It just so happens I just ran into a bug with this! We try to load legacy profiles and convert them to the new format, then if you modify one, we save them all in the new format. Looks like there is a problem using a profile with no primary address if you have not re-saved it in the new format. Looking into it now (and re-opening this until I find the issue).
@jasonmunro commented on GitHub (Apr 18, 2017):
Ok, found the issue and pushed a fix. Phew!