mirror of
https://github.com/dbeaver/cloudbeaver.git
synced 2026-04-25 05:36:14 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #2253] [Docker Image] Switch to Alpine & support more archs #715
Labels
No labels
AS
can't reproduce
can't reproduce
deployment
development
documentation
duplicate
duplicate
ee
enhancement
external
new driver
performance
pull-request
third party issue
wait for response
wait for review
wontfix
x:Oracle
x:cassandra
x:clickhouse
x:db2
x:duckdb
x:greenplum
x:h2
x:h2gis
x:hana
x:hive
x:intersystems
x:kyuubi
x:maria
x:mongo
x:mysql
x:postgresql
x:presto
x:sql server
x:sqlite
x:teradata
x:trino
xf:accessibility
xf:administration
xf:ai
xf:authentication
xf:aws
xf:commit-mode
xf:connection
xf:dark theme
xf:data editor
xf:datatransfer
xf:dba
xf:driver management
xf:erd
xf:filters
xf:i18n
xf:i18n
xf:installer
xf:json
xf:kerberos
xf:ldap
xf:local config
xf:log viewer
xf:metadata
xf:metadata editor
xf:navigator
xf:okta
xf:query manager
xf:resource manager
xf:scripts
xf:sql editor
xf:tasks
xf:ui/uix
xo: Firefox
xo:eclipse
xo:internet explorer
xo:macos
xp:major
xrn:internal
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/cloudbeaver#715
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @the-hotmann on GitHub (Dec 24, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/dbeaver/cloudbeaver/issues/2253
Currently there is just one official Docker Image. It is based on Ubuntu and supported just the
amd64architecture.This was common +5 years ago. These days specially the official Images are provided, based on Alpine Linux and for at least:
amd64/х86_64arm64/aarch64(supported since22.3.3)better would be additionaly:
riscv64armv7armv6armhfppc64les390xx86Most Docker Images I re-dockerized from Ubuntu to Alpine has come down about 80% of the Imagesize (which is already compressed!) and typically are just in general slimmer, more secure and better performing.
It might be worth it, also I dont see any dependencies which Alpine is not able to provide
Specially when we are talking about security issues popping up with automatic scanns, Alpine shows to be one of the best as it is the most up-to-date.
I would be happy to assist if there is a Dockerfile.
Best regards,
Martin